Bottlehead Forum

Other Gear => Speakers => Topic started by: saildoctor on January 13, 2013, 03:19:19 PM

Title: Two subs: one amp or two?
Post by: saildoctor on January 13, 2013, 03:19:19 PM
I'm going to be receiving a set of Blumenstein Orcas and a pair of Orca subs and I'm still contemplating what amplification I would like to use for the subs.  What are some opinions on each sub getting it's own amp VS using one amp that sums channels and feeds both?  Would doing it dual mono style have benefits in the stereo imaging dept?  Or is the thought that with low frequency sound not too much to the table and I may as well get one big amp?
Title: Re: Two subs: one amp or two?
Post by: Doc B. on January 13, 2013, 04:16:42 PM
go stereo on the subs
Title: Re: Two subs: one amp or two?
Post by: saildoctor on January 13, 2013, 04:47:46 PM
I think I just needed a push in that direction.  Thanks!
Title: Re: Two subs: one amp or two?
Post by: 4krow on January 13, 2013, 04:53:17 PM
I don't know about imaging, but the room acoustics might be handled a little better with two subs. Working that out would be something though. In my case I use a Velodyne SMS-1 unit to help me out. It is one piece of equipment that I won't part with.
Title: Re: Two subs: one amp or two?
Post by: porcupunctis on January 13, 2013, 05:12:19 PM
I'm with Doc on this one.  I've been running stereo subs in my listening room for over a year now and it is a noticeable improvement over the single or mono-dual sub systems I've listened to.  A lot of people will tell you that you can't tell where the bass is coming from but my experience is that you really can for the most part.  Having stereo subs in sync with your stereo speakers will make you a very happy listener. 

Go for it.
Title: Re: Two subs: one amp or two?
Post by: Jim R. on January 14, 2013, 04:56:21 AM
Kerry,

I can't disagree with two subs in terms of imaging and fine tuning capabilities, but I did try the experiment briefly with my old caramelzed orcas and subs (in floor stander configuration) and it is possible that the single amp setup gave perhaps a bit more dynamic impact and was certainly easier to setup, but for overal musicality and adjustability, the two amp setup is what you want.

If you do try the one sub approach with the new subs, you'll want to wire them in series as they are 4 ohm speakers, as opposed to the old aluminum cone subs, which were 8 ohms and which I wired in parallel.

HTH,

Jim

P.S. -- Congratulations on making the move!

Title: Re: Two subs: one amp or two?
Post by: tdogzthmn on January 14, 2013, 07:43:11 AM
I have one of the new black cone subs + dedicated amp on the way. 

Does Blumenstein include a wiring diagram and instructions for the proper settings to best integrate the sub with the right and left speakers?
Title: Re: Two subs: one amp or two?
Post by: InfernoSTi on January 14, 2013, 08:10:09 AM
Just another post in support of two subs/two amps. 

My experience is only with OB woofer augmentation, however.  I run my bass in stereo and find a distinctive difference.  Of course I'm using OB "woofers" (each side gets it's own amp driving two bass augmentation towers that each house two 15" drivers crossed over about 70 Hz for a total of 4 15" augmenting woofers).  I think the step up to two amps was more important that the step from 2 drivers to 4 drivers.

Best,
John
Title: Re: Two subs: one amp or two?
Post by: 4krow on January 14, 2013, 09:53:54 AM
John OB subs sound totally sweet. Then again, it is something that I have never heard. So, to compare, what would your impression be between an OB sub and say, a Velodyne type sub?
Title: Re: Two subs: one amp or two?
Post by: Grainger49 on January 14, 2013, 10:02:43 AM
tdogtztmn,

Look at the bottom of this page:

http://www.blumensteinaudio.com/orca-subwoofer-amplifier/

Throughout the Blumenstein site there are different wiring scenarios for Orca Subs.
Title: Re: Two subs: one amp or two?
Post by: earwaxxer on January 14, 2013, 12:35:27 PM
I think two subs would be cool. I have never tried it though. I have my Crown amp bridged to mono with my 12" Dayton Titanic Mk lll, 1,100 watts. I would not want to halve that to stereo with another of the same or better driver. One KW seems about right, so, either two of those or the XLS 2000 for stereo. Please, dont get me started!
Title: Re: Two subs: one amp or two?
Post by: Hank Murrow on January 14, 2013, 01:27:16 PM
I concur with your assessment, John. My Orcas+Subs deliver much more venue-specific ambiance playing in stereo than in mono. A lot more air, plus the ability to play louder cleanly.

Cheers, Hank
Title: Re: Two subs: one amp or two?
Post by: saildoctor on January 14, 2013, 06:50:24 PM
Thanks for the input folks - and Jim thanks for noting they are 4 ohm as I was wondering what they were as I looked at amp options.  Looks like the verdict is clear:  go big or go home!   ;D   Seriously, since I personally like imaging over volume/slam factor it sounds like going with 2 will be the tack I want.
Title: Re: Two subs: one amp or two?
Post by: Jim R. on January 15, 2013, 04:28:44 AM
Kerry,

Thanks for clewing us in on which tack you're going to take.  Oooooooo baaaaaaad!  Sorry, couldn't resist.

Sounds like a plan.

-- Jim
Title: Re: Two subs: one amp or two?
Post by: saildoctor on January 15, 2013, 04:58:17 AM
With that many watts it may even shiver me timbers!
Title: Re: Two subs: one amp or two?
Post by: earwaxxer on January 15, 2013, 12:32:04 PM
With that many watts it may even shiver me timbers!

Hey Kerry - I think the wattage needs to be matched to the right driver to get a good result. I rebuilt my Hsu sub several times over the years and it has gone from a stock low power 125watt sensitive driver combo to a high power punch you in the gut kit. With the Maggies, I was wanting for some of that punch that the Hsu was not really designed for. It was great down to 18hz, but I really needed assist in the 30-40hz area as well. Probably my next build will be a 15" large cabinet to go with the 12". Something that can go a bit lower than where I am now.