Bottlehead Forum

Bottlehead Kits => Legacy Kit Products => Quickie => Topic started by: booangler on October 25, 2009, 05:09:02 AM

Title: Microphonics
Post by: booangler on October 25, 2009, 05:09:02 AM
Good tidings,

I am enjoying this pre-amp as often as I possibly can. My kids still look at me funny, just as most teenagers would, when they see me sitting and listening intently to the beautiful music coming from my system. The one issue I am having is that the tubes are noticeably microphonic! When there is no source input, I can always hear a very bell like tone that lasts a good long time. Simple adjustments to the volume control can induce this into my system, and I won't even discribe what happens when you change the selector switch. Based on this I am concluding that this same tone is coming through while the music plays. I just have not picked it up yet. I still have "happy ear and brain disease" as I call it. Where, no matter what, I am so excited about the change in my system that the ringing has not presented it self to me. In an attempt to rectify this I changed the feet on the case which has had absolutely no impact.

So, now I am looking at other possible fixes, and of course your help. Could it be my tubes? I just realized that I have not yet checked to see if there is any difference between the right and left output. I'll check that when I get home this afternoon. Should I try and dampen the top plate or the tubes? I also noticed that the Tube Data Sheet Locator (http://tdsl.duncanamps.com/show.php?des=3S4) at Duncan's Amp Pages list three other tubes as possible replacements the: CV2370, CV484, DL92. Would any of these be better suited to the Quickie? Is there something else I might be overlooking?

Thanks,

Alan
Title: Not The Answer You Were Looking For
Post by: Grainger49 on October 25, 2009, 07:42:16 AM
I sold a tube preamp to a buddy and the line stage tube went out almost immediately.  He got the most microphonic tube I have ever heard to replace the bad one.  When the micro relay came out of mute the tube rang like a bell!  No exaggeration!  But he loved the extra echo it seemed to add to voices.

So, if you like the tubes in it you can install a DPDT toggle switch after the coupling cap that grounds the output temporarily when you adjust the volume.  If you fear you might leave it in mute, make it a spring return to one position DPDT toggle switch.
Title: Re: Microphonics
Post by: Wanderer on October 25, 2009, 09:24:57 AM
Just checking in to say another Quickie has arrived in the world.

Testing it in a very simple audio chain - Personal CD player to Quickie to Total Airhead to Sennheiser 497 phones.

Sounds good and worked right after assembly.

BUT.....

I also hear the microphonics. A light tap on the face plate gets a nice clear "ding" in the output. The "bell like tone" doesn't seem to last very long but it is certainly there. Kinda fun to lightly tap the tube directly and hear it move from channel to channel. 

Just the nature of tubes with low voltage heaters? I got the NOS GE 3S4. Are the Sylvania any different? Perhaps tuned to a different pitch?

Mine will end up as a headphone amp (not for the low Z Senns) when the parts get here, so microphonic is not a big deal. Interesting what the various approaches to a "fix" will be.           
Title: Re: Microphonics
Post by: Paul Joppa on October 25, 2009, 10:34:07 AM
...I also hear the microphonics. ... Just the nature of tubes with low voltage heaters?       
Probably. The Type 31 (for example) also has a reputation for microphonics.

Might be an interesting substitution - I think you can find sealed lead-acid D-cells ...  :^)
Title: Re: Microphonics
Post by: Paul Birkeland on October 25, 2009, 12:13:29 PM
The microphonic aspect to the Quickie is the one minor drawback.  When using the Quickie as a headphone amp, the step down tends to minimize this considerably. 

Part of the fun of DIY is playing around with solutions to this.  I would imagine some kind of suspended base, tube dampers, etc. etc. would be a fun way to play around with the Quickie and test anti microphonic devices and strategies.  Luckily, the 3S4 runs very cool, so you aren't very restricted in terms of material choices.

-Paul
Title: Re: Microphonics
Post by: Dr. Toobz on October 25, 2009, 04:39:13 PM
I can verify that with headphones, the ringing/microphonic issue is only slight. I can hear taps on the plate or tubes themselves (which have a nice "bell-like" tone) if I hit the amp when no music is playing, but it is quiet enough not to seem to have an effect on the actual music when it IS playing. I'm using Specos to step down the impedance to 500ohms (well, the tap is 500, but the actual impedance should be half that, i.e., 250ohms).

Ringing or no ringing, I love my Quickie!
Title: Re: Microphonics
Post by: Koda on October 26, 2009, 07:25:51 AM
The RCA 3S4 tubes that were included with my Quickie rang like a gong with even the lightest touch on the volume knob.
I bought some NOS (1969) Amprex tubes and the chimes have all but gone silent! The new tubes also have a "fuller" sound throughout the range, more solid bass as well as highs that are not as "shrill" as the RCA's.
I was worried that the ringing would just have to be accepted with this tube, fortunately tube rolling paid off in more than one way.
Of course, not everyone can expect these same results... but at least the 3S4 (or DL92) tubes are not expensive to try
YET.
Title: Re: Microphonics
Post by: booangler on October 26, 2009, 09:08:45 AM
The RCA 3S4 tubes that were included with my Quickie rang like a gong with even the lightest touch on the volume knob...
That is what I am talking about. I am going to have to get a second set of tubes.

Alan
Title: Re: Microphonics
Post by: Dr. Toobz on October 26, 2009, 10:55:21 AM
My tubes were GE - maybe they're a bit less microphonic? Good to know.
Title: Re: Microphonics
Post by: induna on October 29, 2009, 04:24:40 PM
My kit came with GEs that seemed very microphonic to me. They rang with the slightest touch, but I never heard anything during music playback.

I just received a pair of NOS RCA's from Antique Electronics, and they are much less microphonic than the GEs. I have to thump the chassis plate pretty hard with my index finger to get them to ring at all. I haven't had time yet to really listen to them though. I also have a pair of Amperex tubes on the way (these 3S4 tubes are so cheap they beg to be rolled).

And the plate chokes go in this weekend, with new output caps waiting in the wings. What a blast.
Title: Re: Microphonics
Post by: russtafarian on November 13, 2009, 10:51:04 AM
These tubes run so cool, would rubber bands around the tubes work?
Title: Re: Microphonics
Post by: Grainger49 on November 13, 2009, 02:04:41 PM
Maybe an O-Ring?  Viton takes high temperatures well.  But you say you don't need that.
Title: Re: Microphonics
Post by: booangler on November 18, 2009, 03:43:20 PM
Hello my fellow quickers,

Here is a really quick tube update.

Ok I have gone a little over the top with tubes for the Quickie, 3 pair of 3S4's from a local supplier, a set of mullard and a set of Brimar on there way. In the mean time I ordered some DL92's from a seller in England off of flea bay. Of course when I got them they were not DL92 but CV 820. At first I was pissed, but then I relaxed and took a closer look at the tubes. What I found inside the boxes were tubes labeled 3S4 and CV 820. So, I tried them, first thing I noticed was very little micro-phonics, and I mean very little. They sounded good, but I didn't get a good listen to them as my wife Jean came home, and we started dinner.

Cheers,
Alan

PS I am going to head to the hardware store and try to find some grommets or washers that will work as dampers.
Title: Re: Microphonics
Post by: JC on November 18, 2009, 06:00:45 PM
If you're going to the hardware store, ask if they sell automotive heater hose by the foot.  It generally comes in a couple of sizes, and a foot of it is cheap.

Get the size that fits snugly over your small-signal tube; take one with you for sizing.

A 1/2" - 3/4" slice of the hose makes a good envelope damper for your tube.  It is designed to withstand 212+ degree engine coolant and life under your hood, so heat from small tubes won't have much of an effect on it.  It also generally has a layer of re-enforcing fabric molded into it, which adds to its damping ability.

What it won't do, of course, is have any effect on the innards of the tube, but what does?  

My favorite Ace sells it per foot, and a foot of it makes a lot of cheap dampers.
Title: Re: Microphonics
Post by: Grainger49 on November 19, 2009, 02:59:14 AM
JC,

Don't you lose the glow if you put a heater hose condom on your tube?
Title: Re: Microphonics
Post by: Len on November 19, 2009, 03:08:36 AM
JC,

Don't you lose the glow if you put a heater hose condom on your tube?

I haven't seen any glow from the Quickie tubes. Very low filament current and voltage, not much on the HT either.
Title: Re: Microphonics
Post by: Grainger49 on November 19, 2009, 03:10:09 AM
Sadly, many of the tubes that we use have low "Glow Factor."  It makes me listen in the dark at night.

(Didn't Doc advise against listening with your eyes closed at VSAC 2008?)
Title: Re: Microphonics
Post by: Doc B. on November 19, 2009, 05:46:45 AM
Quote
(Didn't Doc advise against listening with your eyes closed at VSAC 2008?)

Absolutely not. I would have advised to listen with your eyes closed. For critical listening you want to reduce the input load on the processor to be able to listen as deep as possible, and vision is a major load on the ol' noggin'.
Title: Re: Microphonics
Post by: JC on November 19, 2009, 05:48:08 AM
Well, some glow still escapes, if there is any.  I have never found any advantage to covering the tube entirely---the 1/2" slice of heater hose usually provides all the damping of the envelope that you're going to get  about halfway down the bottle.

I haven't thought about a way to dress this up, and it truly isn't all that pretty.  I guess that's one of the reasons that commercial tube-dampers are spendy; they tend to look quite a bit better!
Title: Re: Microphonics
Post by: Grainger49 on November 19, 2009, 07:43:40 AM
Quote
(Didn't Doc advise against listening with your eyes closed at VSAC 2008?)

Absolutely not. I would have advised to listen with your eyes closed. For critical listening you want to reduce the input load on the processor to be able to listen as deep as possible, and vision is a major load on the ol' noggin'.

I'm very good with that!  I only heard a preview and didn't get to the lecture for some reason.

And JC, as long as the glow isn't hampered.