Bottlehead Forum

Bottlehead Kits => Legacy Kit Products => Quickie => Topic started by: aragorn723 on February 12, 2013, 10:58:27 AM

Title: thinking about building a quickie
Post by: aragorn723 on February 12, 2013, 10:58:27 AM
Hi, so I have have been thinking about building a quickie to drive a solid state amp, and have been wondering if anyone has considered building a regular power supply for it instead of batteries?  I like the idea of quiet battery power on the one hand, but over the long term wonder how expensive that would get?  At the moment I can listen to the stereo maybe an hour a day if i'm lucky (got a 3 month old son) so maybe headphones are an option too.  Is there a way the Quickie could be used for both a headphone amp and preamp?  Any thoughts
Title: Re: thinking about building a quickie
Post by: corndog71 on February 12, 2013, 11:32:53 AM
When I was using regular duracell batteries for my original quickie (w/PJCCS upgrade) I would get about 3 months or so before needing to change the batteries.  The D cells tend to go faster as they draw more current.  One of the mods I did for my ultimate quickie was to swap the 9V batteries for 3 Power Sonic 12V rechargeable batteries.  In the last 6 months or so I've only had to charge them up once!  No easy replacement for the D cells unless someone else has any ideas.

Then again I tend to listen for several hours at a time so perhaps you could get a bit longer playing time.  If you haven't done much soldering then the Quickie is a great way to get some practice in.  Mine mated well with my solid state Class D Audio SDS-258.
Title: Re: thinking about building a quickie
Post by: Paul Birkeland on February 12, 2013, 11:54:02 AM
Batteries for the Quickie are far less expensive than a wall supply.  I have built (and still have around) one Quickie with a wall supply.  It took two power transformers and several PC boards to create.

I would guess that the parts cost if we sold it as a kit would be about $300. You can buy a lot of D-cells and 9V batteries for $300.

There is a thread on the Quickie forum that's a sticky about converting your Quickie for headphone use, though it's more of a novelty IMO.
Title: Re: thinking about building a quickie
Post by: aragorn723 on February 12, 2013, 02:08:29 PM
Thanks for the replies.  At this point, i'm not the most saavy on building power supplies, so the kit build will be stock (but of course it's nice to know what options are out there!).  Will this preamp be ok to drive my amp and a 10" b&w powered sub?  I don't listen to music super loud, but like to turn it up to hear specific instruments or a singer's voice from time to time.  Also, are the 3S4 tubes easy to find?
Title: Re: thinking about building a quickie
Post by: Paul Birkeland on February 12, 2013, 04:55:50 PM
3S4's are very easy to find and generally not all that expensive (~$5)

How long are the cables to the amp and subwoofer? (and what kind of cables are they)

Also, what is the input impedance of the amplifier and the subwoofer?
Title: Re: thinking about building a quickie
Post by: earwaxxer on February 13, 2013, 03:15:41 AM
You can use AA rechargables for the D cells - get a couple of AA battery adapters at radio crap.
Title: Re: thinking about building a quickie
Post by: aragorn723 on February 13, 2013, 10:32:18 AM
here is my cable and input impedance info:

sub cable- 6ft rca from target (nothing special) and the sub input impedance is 22K
main amp cable- 3 ft cardas crosslink, and the amp input impedance is 10K

 
Title: Re: thinking about building a quickie
Post by: Grainger49 on February 13, 2013, 11:04:31 AM
The cable capacitance is a concern when it will roll off the high frequencies.  The cable connecting a sub need not be high $ stuff.  The 22k input impedance helps keep that from being a problem. 

The lower impedance and almost assuredly lower capacitance of the Cardas cable passes everything on tho the main amp.

I'm saying you are in high cotton. 
Title: Re: thinking about building a quickie
Post by: Paul Joppa on February 13, 2013, 12:04:39 PM
You can use AA rechargables for the D cells - get a couple of AA battery adapters at radio crap.
Most of the cheap rechargeable D-cells are actually AA cells in an otherwise empty can - built-in adapters?!

Real ones, with around half the capacity of an alkaline, are available but hard to find without going to the web.
Title: Re: thinking about building a quickie
Post by: Paul Joppa on February 13, 2013, 12:11:40 PM
here is my cable and input impedance info:

sub cable- 6ft rca from target (nothing special) and the sub input impedance is 22K
main amp cable- 3 ft cardas crosslink, and the amp input impedance is 10K
That's marginal - in parallel, the impedance is 7K ohms; normally I have said 10K is the minimum. But it should work reasonably well. You might eventually want to try a larger output capacitor - I'm not certain the difference is audible, but it could be. It won't be dramatic.
Title: Re: thinking about building a quickie
Post by: Grainger49 on February 13, 2013, 12:37:52 PM
Oh, crap!  I didn't look at the main amp's input impedance.  Most likely a series 10k ohm resistance with the amp's input will put you back where you want to be.  That will cut the input to the main amp in half.  You will need to make adjustments to the sub volume control to bring it down in volume.  The Quickie has a lot of gain.  So overall it will only take a pair of good sounding resistors (~$6 each) and a rebalancing of the sub will do it.
Title: Re: thinking about building a quickie
Post by: aragorn723 on February 13, 2013, 04:00:00 PM
what is the difference between output voltage and gain?  They sound like similar terms to me, the sound and vision magazine article measured the output voltage at 1 volt, which doesn't sound that high compared to the specs of some other preamps i've seen like NAD, etc.  Please educate me, i'm asking out of ignorance here   8)
Title: Re: thinking about building a quickie
Post by: Paul Joppa on February 13, 2013, 05:44:50 PM
Gain is the ratio of input voltage to output voltage. In the stock Quickie with a high load impedance, gain is about 2 - so for a 0.25 volt input, the output voltage is 0.50 volts. For an input of 1 volts, you get 2 volts output. Near the end of the battery life, the maximum output is around 2.3 volts RMS.

With a low impedance load, the gain and maximum output will be reduced. For a 10K load, the gain is about 1.7 and the maximum output at the end of battery life about 1.9v.

A "standard" CD player will generate a maximum voltage o2.0 volts RMS; that's sometimes called "full-scale" output, so 2.0vFS is a common abbreviation.

The gain control works by reducing the input voltage (e.g.2.0vFS from a CD player) to something smaller (e.g. 0.25v) which is then stepped up by the gain (i.e. 0.5v).

You can look in the specs to see what voltage a power amp needs to generate full output; it's usually around a volt but can vary a lot.

=========

Changing the subject a little - decibels are calculated from a voltage ratio, so gain can be expressed in decibels but voltage cannot. Voltage gain is 20 times the base-10 logarithm of the voltage ratio, so a gain of 2 is 6dB. To confuse the issue, the Powers That Be have invented the dBv, defined as the ratio of a voltage to 1.0 volts and expressed in decibels.. So 2.0 volts is 2.0dBv, while 0.5 volts is -6dBv.
Title: Re: thinking about building a quickie
Post by: aragorn723 on February 14, 2013, 03:57:49 PM
so the output voltage depends on what you put into it.. never thought of that.  I see from the delivery status page that orders thru 12-21 have shipped, how long does it usually take to gather the parts and send out a kit?  Also, after placing an order, do they give you an idea of anticipated delivery, and how far along it is, or waiting for parts.. or whatever the status is.. (sorry i do planning for a living lol  Just trying to decide if i'd be able to handle the waiting :)
Title: Re: thinking about building a quickie
Post by: corndog71 on February 14, 2013, 04:08:25 PM
While I only have a few Bottlehead kits, they were all worth the wait. ;D
Title: Re: thinking about building a quickie
Post by: Paul Birkeland on February 14, 2013, 04:57:26 PM
I see from the delivery status page that orders thru 12-21 have shipped, how long does it usually take to gather the parts and send out a kit? 

Most outstanding Quickie orders are scheduled to ship in the next day or two (Josh and I were busy creating the new manual, hence the gap in shipping).
Title: Re: thinking about building a quickie
Post by: earwaxxer on February 15, 2013, 03:10:06 AM
IMO, the Quickie is a fantastic product to get more people involved in tubes, as well as the very satisfying hobby of DIY audio. Way more than $99 worth of fun.
Title: Re: thinking about building a quickie
Post by: aragorn723 on February 20, 2013, 12:05:36 PM
Gain is the ratio of input voltage to output voltage. In the stock Quickie with a high load impedance, gain is about 2 - so for a 0.25 volt input, the output voltage is 0.50 volts. For an input of 1 volts, you get 2 volts output. Near the end of the battery life, the maximum output is around 2.3 volts RMS.

What is the output voltage with the PJCCS?
Title: Re: thinking about building a quickie
Post by: Paul Joppa on February 20, 2013, 02:49:08 PM
Like facebook sometimes says, "...it's complicated". If the operating voltage is where you want it, you should be able to get a bit more voltage out, compared to stock. But I haven't checked how the voltage tracks with varying battery voltage, and the difference between tubes and as the tube ages enters in as well.

If you want the biggest possible headroom, you should use a plate choke, and adjust the bias as well. The Hammond 156C has been popular; a 2K bias resistor will bring the current down for more symmetrical clipping - you might see 9v fresh, 6v depleted batteries.

This is a great way to explore the meaning of operating point analysis. Find the Sylvania spec sheet for the 3S4; it's the one than has the triode-mode curves. Since the voltages are so low, you can experiment all day with no risk of damaging the tube (which is cheap anyhow, if you get experimenter-grade tubes!).
Title: Re: thinking about building a quickie
Post by: earwaxxer on February 20, 2013, 05:02:08 PM
I do like the sound of the chokes. IMO, if your system is a bit more 'revealing' the chokes add a nice smoothness. If you already have tubes thoughout it may not be a good thing, the PJCCS may be a better choice. The cool thing is you can get both and experiment.
Title: Re: thinking about building a quickie
Post by: Paul Joppa on February 20, 2013, 05:09:41 PM
... The cool thing is you can get both and experiment.
I effin' love it! A major point of all the entry level kits, and in fact everything, is to enable those who wish to try stuff, trust their OWN ears, and have a little fun!
Title: Re: thinking about building a quickie
Post by: aragorn723 on February 23, 2013, 09:52:39 AM
I do like the sound of the chokes. IMO, if your system is a bit more 'revealing' the chokes add a nice smoothness. If you already have tubes thoughout it may not be a good thing, the PJCCS may be a better choice. The cool thing is you can get both and experiment.

i'm definitely thinking about going the choke route.  My amp is a BIG solid state pro amp (Inter-m R500) that's 250W X 2, so its powerful, but handles detail pretty well too.  There aren't any tubes in the system now, so maybe that's a good way to go?  I'm a little confused about how the chokes get wired up.  Paul mentioned using Hammond plate chokes with a 2k bias resistor-the chokes don't have a positive or negative side, right?  Also, would the 2k resistors (one per channel??) replace the existing resistors in the kit?  Thanks
Title: Re: thinking about building a quickie
Post by: Paul Birkeland on February 23, 2013, 12:22:24 PM
I'm a little confused about how the chokes get wired up.  Paul mentioned using Hammond plate chokes with a 2k bias resistor-the chokes don't have a positive or negative side, right?  Also, would the 2k resistors (one per channel??) replace the existing resistors in the kit? 

Most off the shelf chokes have no polarity, though the Bottlehead chokes and the Magnequest chokes have one wire that should go to AC ground (not the tube plate).  In the Quickie, you remove each 4K plate load resistor and wire a choke in its place.

The 2K resistors would replace the 1K resistors in the kit.
Title: Re: thinking about building a quickie
Post by: aragorn723 on February 23, 2013, 02:58:58 PM
ok.. so there are 2 sets of resistors in the kit-1K and 4k?? 
Title: Re: thinking about building a quickie
Post by: Paul Birkeland on February 23, 2013, 05:40:33 PM
Yes, there is also a pair of 475K resistors in the kit, but these are not applicable to said modifications.