Bottlehead Forum
Bottlehead Kits => Legacy Kit Products => Stereomour => Topic started by: tumble2k on June 13, 2024, 05:07:55 AM
-
I have heavily modified my OG Stereomour, and I would like to take some additional steps like adding a (solid state) shunt regulator to the driver stage. I am wondering how much current I can get out of the 160V winding of the PT. Right now each channel should draw about 55mA for a total of 110mA at 400V or 44VA. Would I be able to draw 20mA more or 52VA?
My Stereomour has been driving my Omega RS3 Desktop full range near field monitors for 11 years now, and I have had a love/hate relationship with its sound: the upper mids had a lot of glare and the highs were missing. My first mod was to replace the paraded and input DC blocking caps with Mundorf Silver Gold. It made the Stereomour less glare in the miss but did not fix the highs. I tried removing the cathode cap on the 2A3, but that caused the Stereomour to lose its grunt.
I eventually replaced the cathode bypass caps the Elma Siimic II at 47 uF and the cathode resistor with a Mills 1.21K 12W. After a ridiculous 8 day break in period where the amplifier started sounding great, with no glare and good texture. The highs were there but still lacking resolution.
The final mod was replacing the power series resistor with a Triad C-7X 10 uH 250 ohm choke. This finally got me some resolution and air in my highs. The mids were a bit hard and irritating so I replaced the power supply bypass caps with Kemet C4AQ 70 uF 500V film caps, and after a horrible but short 2 day break in period the Stereomour sounded gorgeous!
But I still want to see how far I can take it. For example, maybe I can fix bias the 2A3 with a string of LEDs so I can remove the cathode bypass caps. Add a delayed start for the B+ rail. Replace the 12AT7 with a 5670 (I have a 6.3 V transformer)… Sky is the limit!
-
Right now each channel should draw about 55mA for a total of 110mA at 400V or 44VA. Would I be able to draw 20mA more or 52VA?
The Stereomour I power transformer ended up being quite a bit larger than it needed to be, and IIRC that had to do with commonly available bobbins from our winder. PJ would know best how much current headroom there is on the HV winding, but I'd imagine you could load it down a bit more without any issues.
My first mod was to replace the paraded and input DC blocking caps with Mundorf Silver Gold. It made the Stereomour less glare in the miss but did not fix the highs. I tried removing the cathode cap on the 2A3, but that caused the Stereomour to lose its grunt.
Typically a zero feedback SET amp driving a loudspeaker with an indictive load in the treble will have slightly higher treble output than you'd otherwise expect, so a lack of treble may be more speaker or source related than amp related.
maybe I can fix bias the 2A3 with a string of LEDs so I can remove the cathode bypass caps.
I would definitely not recommend this.
Add a delayed start for the B+ rail.
Why?
You could try an LED in place of the 431 for driver biasing:
https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Broadcom-Avago/HLMP-6500-F0011?qs=jT9z6tsiFNlBU7QuW0wo4Q%3D%3D (https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Broadcom-Avago/HLMP-6500-F0011?qs=jT9z6tsiFNlBU7QuW0wo4Q%3D%3D)
Another big factor that's totally absent here are the tubes you're using...
-
Thank you so much for your insights PB!
I'll wait to hear from PJ about the transformer, but it sounds very promising!
The speakers are definitely a factor in the highs. They are full range speakers, so the resolution in the highs have some limitations. With a stock Stereomour, the Omegas were bright but not airy, which I translate to lacking energy above 10K or so. However in measurements (into an 9 ohm non inductive load) I only see a 1 dB drop in output power at 20 KHz.
Regarding the delayed start, I have been using Sovtek 2A3s as stock. I had one die on me because it was arcing on power up. I thought that maybe a delayed start might help with that. But if that's not useful I would so rather leave it alone. I haven't tube rolled because tubes are $$$ these days.
Regarding the LED biasing of the 2A3s, it appears that I need to get 60V at the cathode (I measured 58 V). As a beginner, I thought I could just get that voltage using LEDs. I would love to hear more why you don't recommend it. Noisy? Or just stupid? If it's noisy, I might be able to add a PNP pass transistor? Maybe 50 mA is too high, although the HLMP 6000 has a max forward current of 90 mA. But with a forward voltage of 1.6V that would require 37 LEDs in series. Maybe that's just dumb. The Stereomour would look like one of those rice rockets from the 90's with under carriage lighting. :o
Regarding biasing of the driver tube, For the 5670, I was thinking about using a 270 ohm resistor in place of the LM431, which would bias the grid at -1V keeping the 3.6 mA current source. I didn't think about using an LED.
I'd like to ask one more question if I may. I saw on the Stereomour II forum that someone replaced the output transformer with a Kaiju one. I asked Eileen about it and she warned me that the Kaiju iron was not designed for the Stereomour. I measured the impedance ratio of the Stereomour to be around 560 so an 8 ohm load would appear as 4500 ohms at the primary (I think that is why the transformer is labelled 4K). Is the important design parameter the plate resistance (800 ohms for the 2A3 and 700 ohms for the 300b)??
There's the parafeed inductor, which I frankly don't understand how to choose. Maybe that won't work on the 2A3 at all. There's also the issue of whether the Kaiju iron would physically fit where the Stereomour iron is (I also have the Triad C-7X stacked atop the parafeed choke).
Thanks again for your insights!
-
Oh and thank you for this wonderful beautiful design! I have learned so much from it and gained a truly lovely sounding amplifier. I am driving it with a Schiit Modi+ and a Antique Sound Labs Mini Phono (15K output impedance). I try to use the Stereomour for background music, but I just get drawn in all the time!
-
The PT-6 is probably good for at least 150mA (75mA per channel) and possibly a bit more - I revised my design process between doing these two designs so my notes are not apples-to-apples.
The issue with biasing the 2A3 is that the bias drifts as the tube ages, and the bias voltage is very sensitive - the transconductance is about 5 mA per volt, so a 1% change in voltage (0.6v out of 60v) produces a 6% change in current (3mA out of 50mA).
The issue of Kaiju OT-5 transformers is they are 3K primary vs. 4K for the Stereomour OT-2. The difference is audible!
The chassis is drilled for either set, so there are two reasonable alternatives:
1) Keep the OT-2's but replace the 20-henry PC-3 plate choke with the PC-5 on the 60-henry tap. This is mechanically a little tricky, but I know PB has done it.
2) Replace both plate chokes and output transformers but increase the current from 50mA to 60mA. This increases the plate dissipation to 18 watts, 20% over the standard 2A3 spec but within the capability of most modern single-plate 2A3s such as the Sovtek, EH, JJ, etc.
In both cases, you'll nee to change the parafeed cap as well.
-
Really helpful information.
I'll definitely have enough current for a shunt regulator.
I guess I won't mess with the OT just yet. Those parafeed caps were $100 apiece on sale! I know the OT-5 PC-5 ain't cheap either!
Thank you so much for answering my questions!
Clif
-
-1V of bias would not be a great choice. The stock operating point is -2.5V of bias and the LED I posted should be a bit over 2V of bias. As you decrease the bias voltage, dissipation will increase across the C4S, and down around 1V of bias, I'd be worried about grid current being an issue. Down around there, you could also accidentally be limiting the power output of the amp since you can't shove enough signal voltage into the 12AT7. If you use an unbypassed cathode resistor, that issue will get a lot worse.
I have put the new Stereomour iron on old Paramours, but I can't remember doing the PC-5/OT-5 on a Stereomour. PC-5 and OT-2 work well together, but they are tricky to mount on a Stereomour chassis since the OT-2 mounting screws are going to prevent the OT-5 from mounting correctly to the chassis. Stereomour I also didn't have the extra chassis holes.
-
-1V of bias would not be a great choice. The stock operating point is -2.5V of bias and the LED I posted should be a bit over 2V of bias. As you decrease the bias voltage, dissipation will increase across the C4S, and down around 1V of bias, I'd be worried about grid current being an issue. Down around there, you could also accidentally be limiting the power output of the amp since you can't shove enough signal voltage into the 12AT7. If you use an unbypassed cathode resistor, that issue will get a lot worse.
Thank you for your patience in answering my questions. I actually meant using -1V for the bias of the 5670, but your comments apply to that too. With a current of 3.6mA, I think that a good bias point for the 5670 might be -3V (833 ohms). I think keeping the LM431 2.5V regulator might be okay too, but there will be more dissipation on the C4S. -edit I could run the LM431 at 3V too.
I have put the new Stereomour iron on old Paramours, but I can't remember doing the PC-5/OT-5 on a Stereomour. PC-5 and OT-2 work well together, but they are tricky to mount on a Stereomour chassis since the OT-2 mounting screws are going to prevent the OT-5 from mounting correctly to the chassis. Stereomour I also didn't have the extra chassis holes.
Good to know. Thanks!
-
Probably better to keep the plate voltage at its current setting by increasing the C4S to 6 mA and setting the grid bias to -4 V with a 680 ohm resistor. Q2 is now dissipating over 1 W, which is theoretically okay but I'll add a heat sink. It looks like one advantage of using the 5670 is that I lower the plate voltage, which gives more headroom for a shunt regulator.
-
Apologies, my earlier post was about the Stereomour II, not the OG version. The Kaiju iron won't fit on the older version
For the 2A3 bias, some people have replaced the electrolytic bypass cap with a film cap and been very happy with the improvement. We incorporated that upgrade in the MonAmour using a 47uF Solen. That could be a good upgrade for an OG Stereomour.
For the driver, the 5670 used in Kaiju runs at 4.3mA/175v/4v bias using a 431 regulator chip with a trimpot to adjust the plate voltage. Without the trim, any fixed-bias arrangement would have too much variance in plate voltage. Using resistor bias would reduce the variance, but it would be a 930 ohm resistor which must be bypassed.
But in the Stereomour II, we kept the 12AT7 but run it at 5.7mA/200v/2.1v bias. The cathode resistor is 365 ohms, which is small enough to not need a bypass. It may be possible to do something similar with a 5670, maybe 3v bias and 6mA = 500ohms(?)
-
Thank you for helping me with this. I will definitely try the film cap too.
One thing I don't understand is why you need to bypass the cathode resistor if it gets to be around 1K. For the operating point you specified I pulled RP=8.3K and mu=30 from the curves. This means that the plate resistance is increased by (mu + 1) * RK or from 8K to 23.5K.
This seems to have no effect on gain because the load resistance presented by the power stage is 249K.
A = mu * RL / (RP + RL + (mu + 1) * RK) = 27
If I keep everything the same and increase RK to 1K, the gain drops to 26.
Also the increased plate resistance should have no effect on the distortion because the C4S has an infinite resistance.
What am I missing?
Anyway, thanks again. I am excited to try your bias point!
-
This seems to have no effect on gain because the load resistance presented by the power stage is 249K.
Signal current modulation through the cathode bias resistor induces degenerative feedback. Rp goes up and gain goes down.
A = mu * RL / (RP + RL + (mu + 1) * RK) = 27
If I keep everything the same and increase RK to 1K, the gain drops to 26.
PJ is commenting that the 5670 with a cathode bias resistor would need a bypass cap.
Also the increased plate resistance should have no effect on the distortion because the C4S has an infinite resistance.
The increased plate resistance has to drive the 2A3 Miller capacitance. The 249K grid leak resistor in parallel with the C4S is the load the driver tube must drive outside the Miller capacitance, and it's definitely not infinite.
-
Many thanks for pointing out Miller capacitance. The 2A3 would have a Miller capacitance of 16.5 pF * (4.2 +1) or 86 pF. The output impedance of the 5670 with an unbypassed 1K cathode resistor is 8300 ohms + 31 * 1K or 39K. The 3dB point is less than 47 KHz. There would be a 0.7dB drop at 20 KHz.
With a 500 ohm cathode resistor the corner frequency would be more than 78 KHz. This would result in less than a 0.3 dB drop at 20 kHz.
With a bypassed cathode resistor on the 5670 the corner frequency is more than 220 KHz.
-
I'm not sure whether to do a new thread or not, but I but because I'm following up on the mod described in this thread, I though I'd write it here.
I replaced the 12AT7 with a GE JAN5670W. To do this I added a small 12.6VAC center tapped transformer (400 mA with secondaries parallelled) for the filaments. Biased the C4S at 6mA and used a 510 ohm cathode resistor. It seems to sound better than the 12AT7. More sense of space.
Anyway the issue is that I often hear a quiet-ish weird scratchy noise coming from both speakers that's independent of the volume knob and input selection. The only other mod that I did that could affect this replacing the power supply series resistors with chokes (described previously).
The tube pins are kind of dirty. I've applied deoxit a few times. Maybe I need to tension the socket? Maybe the tube is going bad?
I am seeing a lot of other posts talking about Wi-Fi router interference. I will investigate that route.
Thanks!
Clif
-
Do you have the 5670 heaters tied to earth in any way?
Definitely do not spray Deoxit into a tube socket. It can attack the plating metal and create green nasties that will require replacement of the socket.
-
Peebs preaches this all the time, and he is right on. Deoxit bad. When I was starting to restore my old Mercedes I did a lot of pulling apart of electrcal connectors, cleaning them and I hit a few with a little Deoxit. The car then sat in a dry, heated garage for about 18 months. When I finally got the car ready to test drive it was a rainy day. Turned on the windshield wiper that I had completely overhauled, and nothing happened. Turned out the connector from the harness to the wiper motor was one of the connectors I had used Deoxit on and a couple pins had turned green. Cleaned up with generic spray electronic cleaner and lightly wiped with dielectric grease and all was good.
They should probably change the name to Reoxit.
-
Thank you for your replies. I do have the 5670 internal shield pin tied to ground. The heater pins are connected to a ganged secondary of a transformer with nothing tied to earth.
Ugh maybe the Dexoit is the problem now. I may have to replace the socket. I'll try regular cleaner like you recommend first.
The problem is not related to Wi-Fi. I turned off my router and the problem didn't go away.
-
Am I supposed to ground one of the heater pins? Grounding one of the heater pins makes the scratching more continuous, less intermittent, if that makes sense. Maybe I should use a 6.3V transformer with center tap and ground the center tap?
-
If the heater winding for the driver has no reference to ground/earth, then you will get noise.
-
I soldered one of the heater leads to ground ... and blackness ... wow nice! Thank you gents!! TIL I need to reference my heaters to ground. Makes perfect sense in retrospect that if the heaters are floating they might have high voltages with respect to the signal. It's not perfect. I'm still hearing occasional ticks and stuff. Could now be Wi-Fi.
Now I'm going to work on a new set of mods. I was thinking about setting up a -60V power supply with my free 12.6V winding on the power transformer and fixed biasing the grids of the 2A3s. I'll need to adjust the bias so that I get 50 mA of current and readjust the bias as the tubes age.
I'm still thinking about putting a single shunt regulator (I have one from Vacuum State) to drive the C4S on both channels. I would pull the power directly from the output of the doubler and filter it with an RC.
Your amp is so much fun!
-
Now I'm going to work on a new set of mods. I was thinking about setting up a -60V power supply with my free 12.6V winding on the power transformer and fixed biasing the grids of the 2A3s. I'll need to adjust the bias so that I get 50 mA of current and readjust the bias as the tubes age.
You'll need to reduce the B+ sufficiently so that you aren't running the 2A3 over maximum voltage. You will also need to lower the grid leak resistor to the appropriate rating for fixed bias in the datasheet, then adjust the coupling cap to restore the desired time constant, then evaluate whether the driver will put up with these changes.
-
Thank you for the advice. Very much appreciated.
An alternative is to put an adjustable shunt regulator on the 2A3 cathode as you do with the 12AT7 on the Stereomour, but it probably won't sound any better than the cap.
-
This is something that I certainly see people do, but you'd want to use a current regulator so that the bias voltage can vary a little bit to attain the desired current. You'll also still need the big bypass cap across it.
The big downsides to doing this are that you'll have some kind of solid state device cooking its brains out that needs a big heatsink, and these kinds of devices tend to short out when the fail, which is the opposite of what's deisred.