Bottlehead Forum

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: pro_crip on July 24, 2010, 02:58:41 AM

Title: Experimenting with caps
Post by: pro_crip on July 24, 2010, 02:58:41 AM
I was curious, when one is experimenting with cap sizes and assuming I stay within voltage ratings and outside the power supply, can I damage the the circuit by going too high or too low? I know there'll be audible diffs, I just don't want to fry an amp. Thanks

rich
Title: Re: Experimenting with caps
Post by: Grainger49 on July 24, 2010, 04:42:19 AM
In some instances the cap value can change.  For instance PJ said there would be no problem with upgrading the FP III output caps, 2.0uF, with "better" 0.47uF caps.  In most all cases the voltage rating should stay the same as you indicated.  I don't know of an instance where the Bottlehead selected cap has a voltage rating higher than needed.  That eats up cost and space, but it might be done somewhere.

Decreasing the value of signal path caps will raise the point where the RC roll off starts in the bass range. PJ aims for a pretty low fo, the 3dB down point of that roll off.  Increasing the value will lower the fo, but you will waste cash.  You might want to get an even better cap instead.

In Bottlehead equipment you can't damage the circuit changing signal path caps.  Don't mess with the RIAA EQ caps in a phono preamp.
Title: Re: Experimenting with caps
Post by: pro_crip on July 25, 2010, 10:56:09 AM
Thanks grainger, just the info I needed and pretty much expected. Just needed some reassurance from those that knows. A round of Woodford Reserve on me :)

Rich
Title: Re: Experimenting with caps
Post by: Paul Birkeland on July 25, 2010, 12:49:40 PM
Hello Rich, I would say you're OK as long as you stay within half an order of magnitude in either direction.  If you really want to try, for instance, a 100uf cap at the output of the Foreplay, a small circuit change would be in order.
Title: Re: Experimenting with caps
Post by: Tickwomp on July 26, 2010, 08:44:14 AM
Expermenting can get expensive fast.  I'm very interested in this topic, because the extended Foreplay has the 3.0uF Auricaps for coupling caps.  I founds some V-Cap CuTF in .47uF that I would love to try, but at that price, I need to know I'm not rolling off any base. 

Can anyone post the math that is necessary to "show" how it all works.  FWIW, my extended Foreplay is only connected to my 300B Paramounts using 24" Silver Interconnects.

Thanks,

Ken
Title: Re: Experimenting with caps
Post by: Grainger49 on July 26, 2010, 09:44:43 AM
Ken,

Edited, I shouldn't leave misinformation out here.

Let's see.  If you are talking about the FP III final output cap, the formula is 1/2*Pi*R*C.  The formula gives the 3dB down point.  Pi is the constant, R is the input resistance of the power amp following the FP III and C is the capacitance.  Remember that 1uF is 0.000001, or 0.47uF is 0.00000047.  For the Paramount I calculate Fo, 3dB down point, of 1.3599 Hz.  The response will be essentially flat a decade above that at 13.599 Hz.
Title: Re: Experimenting with caps
Post by: JC on July 26, 2010, 10:38:48 AM
Isn't micro 6 places to the right of the decimal?  As in 1 microFarad = .000001 Farads?
Title: Re: Experimenting with caps
Post by: Grainger49 on July 26, 2010, 11:29:42 AM
Yes, that makes the fo, 3dB down point at 1.3599 Hz and the response essentially flat at 13.599 Hz. Still very low frequencies.

Edited the above post.

I shouldn't post after working in the yard for 2 hours.  It is near 100 here today.
Title: Re: Experimenting with caps
Post by: Maxwell_E on July 26, 2010, 11:58:20 AM
Hot weather can have an effect on the maths, indeed.
Title: Oh, I have to triple-check any math results to the right of the point.
Post by: JC on July 26, 2010, 12:21:35 PM
Particularly comical when doing it on a cocktail napkin, I might add!
Title: Re: Experimenting with caps
Post by: Grainger49 on July 26, 2010, 01:26:16 PM
A cocktail might have helped.
Title: Re: Experimenting with caps
Post by: Jim R. on July 26, 2010, 03:14:05 PM
Even though the F0 looks good in the edited calculation, you can still hear some cap effects up to 10x that frequency, so take it all with a grain of salt -- it may be fine, or your upper bass;/lower mids may sound a little off.

Also, the cap following a tube rectifier often can't be changed beyond the max for the tube type -- for example, 55-60 uF for a 5AR4.  I realize this doesn't apply to any BH gear, but it's a useful thing to know.

-- Jim
Title: Re: Experimenting with caps
Post by: Paul Birkeland on July 29, 2010, 09:53:17 AM
Expermenting can get expensive fast.  I'm very interested in this topic, because the extended Foreplay has the 3.0uF Auricaps for coupling caps.  I founds some V-Cap CuTF in .47uF that I would love to try, but at that price, I need to know I'm not rolling off any base.

Go with the OIMP's if possible.  I say this because most of the teflon V-caps are made for high voltages, and the Foreplay III does not demand this.  Teflon capacitors are huge almost no matter what you do, but having a higher rated voltage really makes them giant!  In the Foreplay III, this might present you with some mounting issues.  

Even in the standard teflon lineup, there are some larger values with lower rated voltages that should work well.  0.47uf at the output of a Foreplay going into a Paramount isn't a huge issue, but if you plug your preamp in to any old solid state amp, you will likely lose significant amounts of bass.  
Title: Re: Experimenting with caps
Post by: corndog71 on July 30, 2010, 06:44:16 AM
I've used the oimp vcaps in my foreplay II and thought they sounded better than Solens.  After a long time and even changing different tube types I feel they're not so great.  I would recommend Erse or Sonicap.  There are lots of others I haven't tried so there are plenty of other options.  I've read some good things about Clarity caps and will be checking those out soon.
Title: Re: Experimenting with caps
Post by: ssssly on July 31, 2010, 04:27:12 AM
Which caps are you speaking of for the V-caps? Power supply or signal?

Have never used them myself but have only heard good things about them.

Have pretty much gone to all motor runs with a few Obbligato PSU caps for power supplies (have a Solen in the PSU of my SEX). And in my FPII my favorite signal caps are Jupiter wax caps.

Had been debating picking up some V-caps to try out but have been holding off because of the price. What don't you like about them?
Title: Re: Experimenting with caps
Post by: Hank Murrow on July 31, 2010, 05:41:16 AM
Here are Paul Birkeland's ideas about V-caps:  http://www.v-cap.com/bottlehead.php

Long break-in, but I love them in these pieces Paul built for me.  Cheers, Hank
Title: Re: Experimenting with caps
Post by: Jim R. on July 31, 2010, 05:52:25 AM
PB,

On that page Hank just gave the link for, it appears that there is a picture (?) of a 2a3 amp with the CuTF caps.  Any more you can say about thhe amp and it's sonics with these caps?  I have been considering the CuTF caps for the Stereomour coupling caps.

Thanks,

Jim
Title: Re: Experimenting with caps
Post by: Tickwomp on July 31, 2010, 07:48:47 AM
PB,

On that page Hank just gave the link for, it appears that there is a picture (?) of a 2a3 amp with the CuTF caps.  Any more you can say about thhe amp and it's sonics with these caps?  I have been considering the CuTF caps for the Stereomour coupling caps.

Thanks,

Jim

I used the V-Cap CuTF for coupling Caps in my Paramounts.  400 hours is 16.66 days and feels like forever.  Tonight at 2100 hrs will be day 15 for me.  The first week I ran them in my garage system (wired in series with a pair 10 ohm 10 watt resisters).  After I installed them in the Paramounts, I've been running them 24x7 (with a small fan to help control heat). 
Last night was the first time I sat down and listened critically.  Wow, significant improvement (which was still better than I've ever had).    Everything better.
Title: Re: Experimenting with caps
Post by: corndog71 on July 31, 2010, 09:39:01 AM
Which caps are you speaking of for the V-caps? Power supply or signal?

Have never used them myself but have only heard good things about them.

Have pretty much gone to all motor runs with a few Obbligato PSU caps for power supplies (have a Solen in the PSU of my SEX). And in my FPII my favorite signal caps are Jupiter wax caps.

Had been debating picking up some V-caps to try out but have been holding off because of the price. What don't you like about them?

I was referring to the cheaper OIMP v-caps.  I was using a pair of 3.3uF as output caps.  They're ok but kind of boring.  I'm surprised by their performance but maybe they would work better in a different application.

I have a pair of the premium teflon v-caps which I use in my sex amp.  Those I would highly recommend as they just get out of the way and let all the music and dynamics through.  They really took my sex amp to another level of resolution.
Title: Re: Experimenting with caps
Post by: Hank Murrow on August 01, 2010, 04:12:58 AM
Hank here;
The 2A3 Amp you remark on was built for me by Paul Birkeland using a ton of iron(3,5 watts per channel weighing 47 pounds!); including tasty MagneQuest TFA 2004 Jr. Cobalt/M6 outputs. A detailed description can be found here:   

http://www.bottlehead.com/smf/index.php/topic,622.0.html

Though the break-in was very long, the CuTF caps really sing in this topology. Paul used the V-caps in both linestage and phonostage also, described here:

 http://www.bottlehead.com/smf/index.php/topic,64.0.html

http://www.bottlehead.com/smf/index.php/topic,621.0.html

Cheers, Hank
Title: Re: Experimenting with caps
Post by: Tickwomp on August 12, 2010, 08:04:48 AM
Wow Hank your system is almost a thread killer!  Very nice!!

FWIW, there's a nice online calculator on the V-Cap site.  I just pulled the trigger on some CuTF .33uF caps for my Foreplay.  If these make as much difference as I hoping for I'll be really happy!