Bottlehead Forum

Bottlehead Kits => Legacy Kit Products => Seduction => Topic started by: Grainger49 on September 13, 2010, 08:02:35 AM

Title: Seduction And Reduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: Grainger49 on September 13, 2010, 08:02:35 AM
This thread is getting started to explore tube types, different numbers, that can be used in the Seduction (and now Reduction) without any circuit modifications.  That is, drop in equivalents.

These are the ones I have found.  I will modify the OP with others as posters contribute other numbers.

If anyone finds that I have a tube with the wrong pin out, or higher heater current than the Seduction can supply please post and I will modify the OP accordingly.

Seduction Tube Equivalents (in numerical order):

6DJ8
6DJ8 (just the generic, many below are better spec tubes)
6N23P (P9 is shield) -EV are tighter specs
CV2492
CV2493
CV4108
CV4109
CV4110
CV5231
CV5354
CV5358
ECC88
E188C
E188CC
E288CC ?
E88CC
6922
7308

Edit: Three dropped.
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: coca on September 14, 2010, 08:38:42 AM
6H23 will work with no changes.

Bernie.
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: JC on September 14, 2010, 09:01:22 AM
Just to be clear, you are referring to the Russian tube, correct?
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: Grainger49 on September 14, 2010, 09:06:32 AM
Jim,

Yes, the H is a Cyrillic N.  And the P at the end is actually Pi, which doesn't appear on my keyboard.
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: JC on September 14, 2010, 09:43:00 AM
Which explains why one may see them listed as 6N23, 6H23N, 6H23n, and sometimes with a "-EB" suffix.

As if the West didn't have enough numbering systems of its own for tubes!  Lord knows what the Chinese system looks like...
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: Grainger49 on September 14, 2010, 09:47:21 AM
Yes, the Pi really looks like an N, the N is an H and they use B instead of V for volts.  I'm guessing that there is no V in the Cyrillic alphabet.  

The -EB suffix often denotes the higher tolerance tubes, a select tube.  I just ordered 4 from RU Tubes in Moscow.
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: NotBen on December 28, 2010, 05:44:29 AM
I read some posts on the old asylum board from a few years back regarding some of the tubes on this list, specifically the CV2493 and the CV5358: http://tinyurl.com/25g7ano
I just received my Seduction kit and want to know if there has there been a change to the PT-1 or if the old list I linked to is still in question. Or, if for those specific tubes it is a matter of type 1 versus type 2, etc.
Thanks.
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: Grainger49 on December 28, 2010, 07:59:27 AM
Yes, all those are within the range of the PT-1.  The PT-1 can supply rectified and filtered 365 mA per tube.  The design is for 365mA per tube.  Everything on the list is 365mA or less. The two you mention are direct drop in replacements for the 6DJ8 (same heater current). The Seduction manual lists the supplied tubes as 6DJ8/6922.

If you want to use type 2, 3 or 4 tubes the series resistor in the heater supply could be adjusted to bring any of the other types back to exactly the design voltage.  I don't think that the 6DJ8 was run at a full 6.3V.  (5.7-6.3V according to PJ in Reply #12 below.)
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: NotBen on December 28, 2010, 08:49:09 AM
Very good. Thanks!
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: jamestw on February 19, 2011, 08:29:27 PM
Hi Grainger,
How's about this NOS VALVO AMPEREX PCC88 (7DJ8) tube selling at eBay now :
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=250361475103#ht_8010wt_1135

In descriptions: ......Real PCC88 are drop in replacements for ECC88/6DJ8/E88CC with a slightly higher heater specification of 7 volts producing a much longer life and lower noise threshold when used in place of ECC88/6DJ8.

I'm still looking for a pair of spare tubes for my Secduction, Don't know if this kind PCC88 tubes can be directly replaced ?

Thanks,
james
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: Grainger49 on February 20, 2011, 01:51:25 AM
Yes, they look similar.  But it is a 7.6V heater.  The 6DJ8 variants are 6.3V.  There will be a change in the tube's sound with more than a volt low on the heaters.
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: jamestw on February 20, 2011, 05:42:50 AM
Thanks, Grainger.

james
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: Paul Joppa on February 20, 2011, 06:47:03 AM
Seduction runs the heaters at 5.7 to 6.0 volts, which gives the "longer life and lower noise" effect. Running a 7DJ8 that low will give very long life and no noise at all - but no sound either of course; the heaters will be too cold to function!
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: jamestw on February 21, 2011, 12:30:15 AM
OK. now I understanded, Thank you, Paul.
:-)
james
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: 8452 on March 06, 2011, 03:18:50 PM
How about the 6ES8? I inherited 30 Bugle Boys so I hope its OK to use them. I visited several on-line tube substitution guides and this tube is listed as a 6DJ8 sub.
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: Paul Joppa on March 06, 2011, 03:42:26 PM
The 6ES8 is a "semi-remote cutoff" tube, meaning the gain is highly variable depending on the current. It is built that way so that the gain can be automatically adjusted for different radio stations. In audio, that means it is nonlinear as all get-out. It's not suitable for audio. In Seduction, it will also not have anywhere near enough gain.

This tube is often listed, and sometimes sold, as a 6DJ8 equivalent - this is either a product of ignorance or fraud. My opinion of course.
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: Dobs on April 27, 2011, 10:20:00 AM
Seduction runs the heaters at 5.7 to 6.0 volts, which gives the "longer life and lower noise" effect. Running a 7DJ8 that low will give very long life and no noise at all - but no sound either of course; the heaters will be too cold to function!

It's the problem i have with 6N1P tube in my Seduction, some work and some dont.
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: Grainger49 on April 27, 2011, 10:47:27 AM
The 6N1P draws twice the heater current than Seduction was designed for.  The Seduction transformer will burn out after a while using them.  But they are good sounding tubes and were used in the design stage as reported by PJ.

If you want to run the 6N1P, then buy a transformer that will give you double the current for the heaters and put a 500k ohm resistor to ground where the 1M ohm resistor is after the interstage coupling cap and before the grid stopper 220 ohm resistor.  After getting a higher current transformer in there you might need to adjust the voltage on the heaters by changing the series resistor in the heater supply.  This is also according to PJ.
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: Dobs on April 27, 2011, 12:28:42 PM
The 6N1P draws twice the heater current than Seduction was designed for.  The Seduction transformer will burn out after a while using them.  But they are good sounding tubes and were used in the design stage as reported by PJ.

I hope i didnt damaged too much my transformer because im using 6N1P for about 2 years now with around 800h of play.

Quote
If you want to run the 6N1P, then buy a transformer that will give you double the current for the heaters and put a 500k ohm resistor to ground where the 1M ohm resistor is after the interstage coupling cap and before the grid stopper 220 ohm resistor.  After getting a higher current transformer in there you might need to adjust the voltage on the heaters by changing the series resistor in the heater supply.  This is also according to PJ.

Can you guide me to get a good transformer? And also give me more details on the parts to get and the way to locate them. I have build my Seduction 4 or 5 years ago and i dont have anymore documentation about it.

Thanks again,
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: Paul Joppa on April 27, 2011, 02:29:07 PM
I have not yet found a good alternative - in fact, we developed the PT-1 because there were no really suitable transformers even for the 6822 version.

The simplest approach would be to run the 6N1P on AC heater power, bypassing the rectifiers entirely and grounding one side of the winding. This will reduce the RMS current to within spec. There is risk of hum, but there are various inexpensive ways to improve that. I've posted this for years but I don't remember anyone having tried it.

The next simplest approach would be to replace the heater power supply with a 6vDC external supply, as many people did with the original Foreplay years ago. It should be rated for 1.2 amps or greater.  These are usually the kind that have a small box to plug into the power outlet, the so-called "wall wart". Caution - some of these are fine, some are junk, and it's hard to tell which is which!
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: Grainger49 on April 27, 2011, 02:30:58 PM
The specs I just read say each tube draws 600mA +/-50mA.  So on the outside that is 1.3A.  Give your self some room to rectify and filter the heaters.  Get at least 1.5A 6.3V transformer (Hammond 166L6).  You can use a three pin regulator chip and trim up the voltage to exactly what you want.  For that you should get a 1.5-2.0A 8V transformer (Hammond 166L8).

Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: Dobs on April 27, 2011, 02:41:44 PM
Wich way is best?

Can i install the transformer into the Seduction without compromising the sound with electrical noise.
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: Dobs on April 27, 2011, 02:46:34 PM
The specs I just read say each tube draws 600mA +/-50mA.  So on the outside that is 1.3A.  Give your self some room to rectify and filter the heaters.  Get at least 1.5A 6.3V transformer (Hammond 166L6).  You can use a three pin regulator chip and trim up the voltage to exactly what you want.  For that you should get a 1.5-2.0A 8V transformer (Hammond 166L8).

On the spec i saw the hammond give 2a at 6.3v I assume its 6.3vdc? When you say 3 pins regulator chip you mean variable resistor?
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: Grainger49 on April 27, 2011, 03:27:34 PM
Transformers produce AC so if you want to go with DC you have to use either a full wave bridge or four diodes arranged in a bridge, some capacitors and a resistor to smooth the rectified AC.

The three pin regulator is a good way to go for smooth and noise free DC.  (you still need everything mentioned above)

This part is an adjustable voltage regulator but with 5 pins (I couldn't find a three pin regulator):

http://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Sharp-Microelectronics/PQ070XH02ZPH/?qs=sGAEpiMZZMsGz1a6aV8DcJFN%252bbTDeMTjFe%2f59o4dkoI%3d

Edit: this transformer would have to be out of the Seduction chassis or it will hum.

It has 10V maximum input, 2A maximum current and is adjustable from 1.5 to 7 volts.
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: Paul Joppa on April 27, 2011, 06:30:23 PM
There are two problems with the Hammond transformers suggested, both of which mean that they will generate excessive magnetic hum fields and cannot be placed near the Seduction. (Without testing, I would guess that a minimum 12 inch distance would be adequate - but not in the same box!)

The first problem is a lack of magnetic headroom; the second is having the windings separated into two different bays of the bobbin. Note that the PT-1 runs 70-80 percent as much magnetic induction as the Hammonds, and still needs both a copper shield and a molyperm shield tape. This greatly increases the cost of this transformer and - you know Bottlehead - we would not do that unless we had to! My second attempt at a good phono preamp power transformer is the PT-5 in the Eros; it does not need the shield tapes but is much larger, so no cost savings there.

Our experience developing the Seduction - one of our earlier products - is what convinced us that we should use custom power transformers in all our products, designed for low-noise audio applications.
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: Dobs on April 27, 2011, 08:04:20 PM
I thought the Hammond was to be used as a stand alone supply for the heater only instead of a cheapo wall wart type, right?

Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: Grainger49 on April 28, 2011, 01:31:14 AM
An outboard power supply is indicated for this application.  It is not that hard to do.
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: Doc B. on April 28, 2011, 05:12:01 AM
Quote
I hope i didnt damaged too much my transformer because im using 6N1P for about 2 years now with around 800h of play.

Actually I would say that you have proven that the PT-1 can be run way over spec and handle it pretty well. I'm not condoning this, as it could be that the transformer might fail for some one else running in this same condition of overload. But if it's already been running for two years for you without incident I wouldn't really expect a catastrophic failure...just don't ask us for warranty coverage if it goes. Strikes me that a simpler solution than changing the power supply is to go back to the tubes it was designed to work with.
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: Dobs on April 28, 2011, 11:46:59 AM
Transformers produce AC so if you want to go with DC you have to use either a full wave bridge or four diodes, some capacitors and a resistor to smooth the rectified AC.

The three pin regulator is a good way to go for smooth and noise free DC.  (you still need everything mentioned above)

I will go that way if DC is better then AC.

Can you make a small plan and part list to do this with the regulator and how to proceed for the voltage adjustment in the final stage.

Thanks again,
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: Dobs on May 08, 2011, 05:54:34 PM
Yes, no, maybe?
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: Grainger49 on May 08, 2011, 11:59:20 PM
Yes, DC is better, lower noised, than AC.  I can't give you a schematic and parts list because I haven't done that.  You will need to get that from someone else.

Feed the supply from a 6.3 to 7V transformer winding.  You will need 4 diodes, UF4007 are fine, Cree soft recovery diodes are better.  You will need two 1000uF 16V capacitors and a 100 ohm 1/2 watt resistor.

I suspect that there are fixed voltage regulators for 6.3V, certainly 6V and rated at 1.5A minimum 2A is better.  A fixed regulator has three pins and puts out the specified voltage with a little of the input voltage wasted.  One pin is the input, one the output and the other is the "reference" pin.  That is attached to the voltage you want to regulate to by resistors.  I believe it is grounded when you are using a fixed regulator chip.

With 6.3V AC rectified and filtered you get a little more than 6.3V DC and the regulator wastes some of that voltage in the regulation process.  There are also variable output regulators that you can set up to put out any voltage you want. 

That is the best I can give you.  Maybe others might give more specifics if you want to start a thread in Tech Topics for a Seduction regulated heater supply.
Title: Re: Seduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: Dobs on May 09, 2011, 09:46:07 AM
Ok, super!

Thread started here: http://www.bottlehead.com/smf/index.php/topic,1822.0.html
Title: Re: Seduction And Reduction Tube Equivalents
Post by: Grainger49 on September 07, 2013, 02:03:31 AM
Bumped to include Reduction in the title.