Bottlehead Forum
Bottlehead Kits => Legacy Kit Products => Reduction => Topic started by: Marty on May 17, 2023, 04:09:00 AM
-
I'm looking at getting some higher end caps for my pre. Can the three .01uf wired in parallel be replaced by one .033uf cap? And if yes what voltage? Are there any advantages or downsides?
-
It would be much better to replace the three 0.01uF caps with one 0.030uF cap (which is what we use in the Eros). If you go with a 0.033uF cap, you are introducing an error into the RIAA EQ that wouldn't otherwise be there with the stock circuit, so objectively that would be making the amp perform worse.
-
Thanks
-
The only problem is that finding high quality .03uF caps isn't that easy. Lots of good .033uF caps around, but upgrade-worthy .03uF caps are hard to find. Anyone have recommendations? Because I've looked.
-
Put two 0.015F caps in parallel. If you buy a few extras, you should be able to get two pairs that make very close to 0.030uF when paralleled.
-
The history of the design is that in the Seduction I originally used 0.033uF caps, with the second cap being 0.010uF + 0.0012uF in parallel. (The two RIAA caps are very close to 3:1 ratio). Precision caps (i.e. 1% or 2%) are not available in as many different values, so even that was hard to find - in the end we just used 5% caps.
In the Reduction I switched to 0.030uF and 0.010uF since multiples of 10 are almost always available in precision lines. By paralleling three to get the 0.030uF, you need 8 identical 0.010uF caps. Usually there is a price break for 10 caps, so if you have a capacitance meter you can select the best 8. In fact, by paralleling the outliers carefully, you are likely to be able to get excellent precision even with 5% caps.
Of course, few (if any?) ever took me up on this option. :^)