Thanks for that, CB.
I just came across a thread at AA where an owner of a Mono 8 w/6EM7 reports that George said a 6SN7 (among other tubes) could be swapped in place of the 6EM7, but for less gain.
https://www.audioasylum.com/cgi/t.mpl?f=set&m=1475It makes me wonder if perhaps George did not substantially change the circuit for the Mono 8 for each "new" driver tube over the years, but kept it more-or-less the same and simply offered it with different input/driver tubes. Do any of you who knew George know anything about that?
Looking back over the images of a Mono 8 w/6SN7 that I posted at the beginning of the thread, with the new knowledge gained in the meantime, it appears the plate and cathode resistors are largely the same as in the 6EM7 model (with maybe a few ohms difference on triode 1 Rk) and that triode2 uses a bypass cap (the little white one that's hard to see) that's not in the 6EM7 model.
Back in reply #2, CB suggested a 470uF/10V bypass cap at 6SN7 Rk2. The little white one in the pic says "120" but I can't tell what that pertains to. It looks like a metalized film type rather than an aluminum electrolytic.
Anyway, putting a 6SN7 into the LTSpice model, with Rp1 100K & Rk1 3K | Rp2 27K & Rk2 of 1K, and 323V B+ available to that tube (there's 357V B+ for the 300B), we get:
B+ -- 323V
6SN71 plate/cathode -- 139V/5.5V (1.8mA)
6SN72 plate/cathode -- 177V/5.4V (5.4mA)
Can take up to 0.7V input signal before clipping
I tried my hand at load lines (attached), which look OK though I'm not sure I did it right.
6SN7 Triode 1:
B+ 323V
Rp 100K
323/100K = 3.23mA
So the line goes from 3.23 mA at 0V to 0mA at 323V. The line seems to match what I get in the model as 1.8mA at 139V. Does that seem correct?
6SN7 Triode 2:
B+ 323V
Rp 27K
323\27K = .0119
Let's round that to 12mA at 0 volts and 0mA at 323V. Likewise, this line seems to match the 177V/5.4mA point on the model.
What do we think about that? Should I get the couple of resistors and caps that I'd need, and do it up on the breadboard tomorrow?