I've been playing around with the Quickie, as it's an easy and low-voltage way to learn more about tubes. I recently had an idea - if no gain is needed, but one still wanted to "color" the sound or provide a better match between components, why not run the Quickie as a cathode follower? Obviously, it cannot swing much voltage, but we're only taking about CD-level signals (2V) going into a 100k load. I can report that this actually does work, and IMO, sounds better than the Quickie when used in plate mode. Distortion appears low, the bass is very solid, and microphonics are not as big of a deal. Some gain is lost, of course. This makes me wonder if my circuit is optimal, or if a tube with a higher transconductance would be a better choice (such as the 3V4, which is around 2000 microhmos).
Basically, I ran the B+ to the plates of the tubes (I have a red indicator LED in between; this drops the B+ by 1.5 or 2V), disconnected the output capacitors from the plates, and replaced the 1k resistor/1000uF cathode bypass with a 150H, 3700 ohm choke on each channel (i.e., as to load the cathodes). From there, I hooked up the output capacitor/parallel 470k resistor to the junction in between one leg of the choke and the cathode pin.
Any way to optimize this to get closer to unity gain? I estimate about a 3 or 4dB loss right now. I've played around with cathode resistor values and 3 or 4k seems optimal, but I'm not sure why - I'm guessing it might it have to do with the fact that the ideal load for this tube is about 4k on the plate, since the Rp in triode mode is 4k? So, the inverse of this would be a similar load on the cathode? Also, would the 3V4 work better? I'm also assuming that there is no way to make use of the pentode screens here, since what matters is the signal on the cathode (interestingly enough, the tubes in pentode mode are no different - even disconnecting the screens from the anodes makes no difference here).