Extended Foreplay Coupling Caps

J Leng · 16855

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline J Leng

  • Jr. Member
  • **
    • Posts: 12
on: December 14, 2009, 10:07:11 AM
Am I correct in thinking that if my power amp has an input impedence of 100k then I only need the coupling capacitor value to be 0.47uF and any large capacitor will not make any difference to the sound quality?



Offline Paul Joppa

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 5839
Reply #1 on: December 14, 2009, 01:19:28 PM
For frequency response you are correct.

However, there is a hum-reduction argument that says to keep the source impedance of the capacitor no greater than the preamp's output impedance at 60Hz. That works out to be 3.8uF for a Foreplay III.

If it were me, I'd go ahead and try it. If there is any hum or interference problem, just replace the original cap leaving the new one in place as a bypass. (I'm assuming you ask because you have a higher-quality 0.47uF cap in mind as an upgrade ... )

Paul Joppa


Offline J Leng

  • Jr. Member
  • **
    • Posts: 12
Reply #2 on: December 14, 2009, 11:40:31 PM
Thanks for that, would the hum be present on all sources, as there is hum present on my phono stage?



Offline Paul Joppa

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 5839
Reply #3 on: December 15, 2009, 05:48:59 AM
It's an output thing, so would be present identically on all sources.

For what it's worth, I had the same thing - hum on phono only - which disappeared when I changed phono preamps.

Paul Joppa


Offline J Leng

  • Jr. Member
  • **
    • Posts: 12
Reply #4 on: December 15, 2009, 06:55:06 AM
I thought so, I've just changed op amps in my phono stage to a discreate GD Audio op amp and I think that's where the problem is.

J