Hey Rob -
I'm a bit surprised as well. Shocked actually. I can tell you generally what I like about the Gungnir sound via balanced vs the Gungnir via Quickie as preamp.
First of all, the Quickie sound has been preferred in ALL the previous comparisons I have tried due to the wonderful 3rd order harmonics, fleshing out of the sound etc. The Quickie did not appear to subtract from any of the desirable clarity from the sound. If anything, it added shape and definition to each instrument. Even using the Quickie in front of a integrated t-amp transformed the t-amp sound in marvelous ways.
Now, the Gungnir is set up to take advantage of balanced connections. I knew that from the get go when I bought it. I have not been a believer in balanced, but now I am. The Gungnir uses discrete analog stages, and is naturally balanced, but uses summing stages to convert to single ended. It has two sets of single ended outputs as well.
When I first compared the sound of the SINGLE ENDED output of the Gungnir direct to power amp, vs. the Gungnir to Quickie - the Quickie in the circuit easily bested the Gungnir due to the above. Flesh on the bones was always more engaging. Now, the balanced out on the Gungnir is a whole other league entirely. Very impressive. Fantastic highs. Nice, natural tube like decay. Great bass. Very real. Its been said before, DAC makers like Schiit, Burson, Bryston etc. are really honing their sound. These are not you grand-dads DAC's. Together with the laid back character of the Emotiva, the Gungnir is a great combo, with or without tubes.
PS - the Quickie is adding some very nice bass drive for my Crown/sub. Win/win!
Cheers - Eric
Eric
Emotiva XPA-2, Magnepan MMG (mod), Quickie (mod), JRiver, Wyrd4sound uLink, Schiit Gungnir, JPS Digital power cord, MIT power cord, JPS Labs ultraconductor wire throughout, HSU sub. powered by Crown.