Here's a question for anyone who has had a chance to compare the stock volume pot with an Alps Blue Velvet, which seems to be a popular and low cost modifier part.
I'm aware it's said the stock pot isn't great at matched channel tracking at the lower range of its settings, but I've addressed that by padding down the volume. To me, my Crack sounds great as it is, but I wouldn't mind to squeeze a little more juice out of the fruit if possible. What would the Alps Blue Velvet, or other alternatives, get me compared to my padded down stock pot?
« Last Edit: November 25, 2014, 07:23:22 PM by Nathan »
Crack/Speedball, SEX 2.1/C4S, Bryston BHA-1
Sennheiser HD600/Cardas cable, Beyerdynamic T1 2nd Gen, Hifimam HE560/Hifiman balanced cable