COPPER COVERS FOR S.E.X. AMP OPT. TRANSFORMERS

coca · 14420

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline coca

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 141
on: June 11, 2010, 05:40:49 AM
Good day all! I would like to have copper covers made for my S.E.X. AMP optput transformers. This would strickly be for cosmetic purposes, as I plan to have the chassis plate copper plated. I would like to know if there are any negative side effects in using copper as the material in covering the opt. transfos.?

Thanks in advance.

Bernie.



Offline mrarroyo

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 89
Reply #1 on: June 11, 2010, 06:26:37 AM
If not sealed you will have to live with the oxidation (green color).



Offline Jim R.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 2194
  • Blind Bottlehead
Reply #2 on: June 11, 2010, 09:36:49 AM
I can't say for sure if performance will be impacted or not, but all metallic covers that cover the entire winding, act as a shorting turn on the transformer, at least that's what more than one transformer maker has told me.  They also said that it doesn't have to be a ferrous metal to have that effect, but I've not done any experiments to verfiy this or not.

Feeling around on my amp here it looks like things are going to get pretty tight and the heat from the PT may be an issue.  Again, just a caution as I haven't done this myself.

Hope one of the BH guys can chime in and clear this up (for both of us).

-- Jim

Jim Rebman -- recovering audiophile

Equitech balanced power; uRendu, USB processor -> Musette DAC -> 5670 tube buffer -> Finale Audio F138 FFX -> Cain and Cain Abbys near-field).

s.e.x. 2.1 under construction.  Want list: Stereomour II

All ICs homemade (speaker and power next)


Offline Paul Birkeland

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 19732
Reply #3 on: June 11, 2010, 10:22:29 AM
This is odd, as it seems to have come up also on the AA tube diy forum.
 A shorted turn is most common (and easiest to visualize) in toroidal transformers.  If you imagine your doughnut mounted to a metal chassis plate with a bolt and another metal plate up top, you can see that nothing completes a loop around the core of the transformer.  If you decide to make the mounting more secure and you pass the mounting bolt through the other side of the chassis, or you add a bracket from the top of the transformer to the side of the chassis, now you have a complete loop around the core of the transformer, and hence a shorted turn.  
(https://forum.bottlehead.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amgistoroids.com%2Fassets%2Fimages%2Ftoroidal-tech-fig-02.jpg&hash=87d20e5e7e794761c2319f7a60b6063629b8241e)

In the photo above, you just need a loop that wraps around that isn't an actual winding.

In an EI transformer, the primary flux paths are essentially inaccessible to any reasonable type of cover.  
(https://forum.bottlehead.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amgistoroids.com%2Fassets%2Fimages%2Ftoroidal-tech-fig-01.jpg&hash=4a468004cede1da674a111a7670b3a8b92b1dac3)

In the EI transformer, windings wrap around the inner piece of the diagram above, so creating a shorted turn would involve a cover that actually wrapped around the bobbin between it and the stack (this is not to be confused with a Faraday shield).
(https://forum.bottlehead.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsound.westhost.com%2Fxfmr11-3.gif&hash=c494640faf5c41b7d98bd18d5628bd04424597cb)
 A cover around the transformer is intended to act as a shorted turn to the leakage flux (the outer loop), but it doesn't create a loop in the interior.  If you have a Seduction laying around, you can observe that the copper wrap goes around the outside of the transformer, over the bobbin, but does not create a shorted turn.  
(https://forum.bottlehead.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsound.westhost.com%2Fxfmr13-4.gif&hash=7a1ef676b511f839e3301b514f01036ffd5b569b)


(Sorry Jim, I wish I had better words than photos, but not today :(  )

Paul "PB" Birkeland

Bottlehead Grunt & The Repro Man


Offline Jim R.

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 2194
  • Blind Bottlehead
Reply #4 on: June 11, 2010, 10:35:03 AM
Hey Paul,

That's ok, and I can see what you're saying, and it even makes sense to me.  Thanks for the education.  I'll admit, these things would be much easier to describe visually.

-- Jim

Jim Rebman -- recovering audiophile

Equitech balanced power; uRendu, USB processor -> Musette DAC -> 5670 tube buffer -> Finale Audio F138 FFX -> Cain and Cain Abbys near-field).

s.e.x. 2.1 under construction.  Want list: Stereomour II

All ICs homemade (speaker and power next)


Offline coca

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 141
Reply #5 on: June 14, 2010, 07:16:58 AM
I don't have a Seduction, but I do have a couple of PT1 transformers I can eyeball.

Thanks a lot

Bernie.