I bought the Quickie as a temporary substitute for my Foreplay, which needs the volume and selector switches sorting out. The problem is I've put 50 hours on the Quickie and the Foreplay is sitting forgotten in the corner - I prefer the way the Quickie sounds! I like the overall smooth and more (for the want of a better word) organic presentation. I've always found that Bottlehead gear to provides a very musical insight, yes as has been said before, more music less Hi-Fi - just the way it should be.
So here is this little pipsqueak of a pre - I can hear the limitations in the bass, loss of treble detail, lack of authority in overall presentation, it is blatantly not as good, but still it deliverers something very musical and I've yet to PJCCS it.
So is it the direct heated bit, the triode operation, the removal from the mains, its pure simplicity.....or all those things combined?
Perhaps it's just delusional and I was in need of a change, but I can't see me rushing to sort out the Foreplay anytime soon, may just sell it and put the money toward a Manley Skipjack switch box, and maxing out the Quickie, component wise!
Paul
Paul Williams
Acoustic Signature Challenger (with 3 arms) Entre SUT+Seduction, Smash(out) & Quickie(in again), Paramour II's, 7 Pi Corner Horns or Quad 44, Quad 405-2 & Videoton Minimax GB3.