I have not yet documented the technical history of the AfterGlow/ParaGlow/Paramount direct coupled amps, though I intend to do so eventually. But I do recall that the ParaGlow originally used the deYoung power transformer, and later switched to the PGP8.1. The PGP8.1 produces more voltage than the deYoung, but at the time we did not update the manual. This led to a lot of confusion at the time.
The higher voltage should be used to increase the headroom of the driver, which in the original version operated at only 100v on the plate.
You should see around 455 volts at the second power filter cap, or 440v at the 45 plate. Assuming the conservative 250v/34mA operating point, that gives 190v at the cathode, so a bias resistor (using Ohm's Law) would be 190/.034=5600 ohms. Bias is 50v, so the driver plate should be at 190-50=140v. The driver cathode bias resistor can be increased to obtain this target. I have provided the calculations so that you can re-calculate if your powerline voltage is different from the PGP8 design target, which is I believe 117vAC.
I think you already have a working ParaGlow 45 with PGP8.1? If so, you can check the voltage (relative to ground) at the 45 plate. If it is much higher than the 440v estimate above, the adjustment will among other things require a higher-resistance cathode resistor for the 45. I suspect this may have been the case 15 years ago, which would explain the 7K resistance.
You did not identify the plate chokes, but if you do I will calculate an appropriate parafeed cap. Today, I would connect it to the 45 cathode rather than ground as in the original. There are other changes I might make now, but that's a whole 'nuther conversation, and I want to gather the history first.