Output Capacitor Upgrading Questions

jrihs · 144847

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline EniGmA1987

  • Jr. Member
  • **
    • Posts: 11
Reply #240 on: February 13, 2015, 08:15:21 PM
I am going to be upgrading my output capacitors and doing a smaller bypass cap. However, I had bought a 0.1uF Mundorf Silver|Gold+Oil for the bypass cap use and I am seeing a lot of people on this site are going with values closer to 1uF. I also happen to have some 2.7uF Mundorf Aluminum+Oil here, would it be better to use the 2.7's or the higher quality 0.1 capacitors for the bypass? Or should I hold off and get some 1uF capacitors to use?
The larger output cap will be staying stock for a little while longer until I do a couple other mods, and once I know how much space I have left I will be replacing them with either some 100uF F&T electrolytic's or some 85uF Clarity film caps if I have enough room.

One more question for output capacitors that will probably be really crazy, but just wanted to ask about before I give it a try. I know that capacitors in series block DC, but can pass AC if the frequency is high enough. Smaller values of a capacitor can "bleed through" more frequencies. So my crazy idea is, what if I used a silver mica capacitors in series on each channel right before the headphone out, in the range of something like 0.0001uF so that pretty much all the frequencies could get through (probably cutoff at 10Hz or lower) but would help to block out any remaining DC voltage that is still around? Would that idea even work at all? Do you think it would sound absolutely horrible? Is every little bit of DC filtered out by that point anyway so it is useless? I am thinking of trying it out just to satisfy my curiosity, and the experiment can always be undone afterwards anyway. I just wanted to ask about my idea first in case it would make the amp explode or something (lol) if I were to ever try it.
« Last Edit: February 13, 2015, 08:25:19 PM by EniGmA1987 »



Offline Grainger49

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 7175
Reply #241 on: February 14, 2015, 06:06:47 AM
Capacitors in parallel add.  You bypass by putting the capacitors in parallel so you are passing lower frequencies, one or two Hz, using a larger capacitance.

As for bleeding, this happens at startup.  As the capacitor(s) charge a small amount of the DC voltage bleeds through.  That is the function of the resistors on the output jack.  There is also a sticky in the Crack folder that describes a way to make that voltage even lower.

You don't want to put anything in series with the output capacitors.  It will block a lot more frequencies.



Offline 2wo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 1261
  • Test
Reply #242 on: February 14, 2015, 12:26:46 PM
I think you have the wrong idea about caps in series and blocking DC. The main purpose of the output cap is to block the DC and allow the music (AC) thru. Any decent cap will do an effective job blocking the DC but has to be sized to allow the low notes to pass. your idea of inserting a very small cap in series will block all but the most extreme high frequencies...John       

John S.


Offline ZacharyP

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 68
Reply #243 on: February 23, 2015, 11:58:58 AM
Has anyone here attempted to replace the two coupling caps with two Solen 100uf 400v mkp?  Also any reccomandations on a film cap to replace the last electrolytic in the power supply?



Offline ZacharyP

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 68
Reply #244 on: February 25, 2015, 02:37:59 AM
Forgot to mention I'll be replacing the last resistor in the power supply with a triad c7x choke.  If I understand correctly this means I can use a lower uf capacitor, but it shouldn't be any lower than my coupling caps, so I'd be looking for 100uf ideally.  I'm still kind of new to this and I've done hours of reading at this point still trying to fine tune my understand.



Offline Grainger49

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 7175
Reply #245 on: February 25, 2015, 03:30:30 AM
Zachary,

A number of Bottleheads have used the C7X in the Crack.  Not everybody availed themselves of the opportunity to upgrade the last cap with film.  Do a quick search and you will find several different values for that final cap. 

IMHO, going to film is a good step up.  Going to a designer film, high $, isn't necessary.



Offline ZacharyP

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 68
Reply #246 on: February 25, 2015, 03:40:37 AM
Grainger,

Thanks for the reply.  I think I'll stick with my Solens and fit them in as my coupling caps.  I agree, it seems that capacitor prices are here to remind us just how diminishing the returns can become :D



Offline Grainger49

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 7175
Reply #247 on: February 25, 2015, 05:17:51 AM
There is no "Like" so:

(https://forum.bottlehead.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi244.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fgg7%2FGrainger49%2FSmiles%2Fthumbsup_zps4d4312f2.gif&hash=fcc4a0e009432b061e176ccb2802f87dcbbe185c)



Offline EniGmA1987

  • Jr. Member
  • **
    • Posts: 11
Reply #248 on: March 05, 2015, 06:22:22 AM
So as part of my massive no holds barred upgrade to the Crack I am upgrading the output coupling caps and one or two of the filtering caps to film. I am wondering if anyone knows the sound difference or an opinion on which is better between the Mundorf MKP and aluminum EVO capacitors? They are the exact same price for 150uf capacitors. The MKP description talks about things like low loss factor, but then there is a ZN series (that doesnt go high enough uF) that in their description talks about having a loss factor 10x lower than the MKP's! So are they really very good? Maybe the EVO's are better? I dont really know because I cant find much info and descriptions for the EVO series. Another thought would be to use Clarity Cap 175uF TC600 capacitors, that specifically list an ESR of 1mOhm and low ESL. I was planning on using these Clarity caps for the PSU filtering but maybe I should just use them for both tasks? Model numbers are:

MUNDORF-71347 <- MKP series
MUNDORF-76417 <- EVO aluminum series
CLARITY-77666 <- TC600 series


Also when I move from 100 to 150Uf, should I leave the output jack resistors at 2.5k or drop down to a bit lower?
« Last Edit: March 05, 2015, 06:36:10 AM by EniGmA1987 »



Offline Paul Birkeland

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 19750
Reply #249 on: March 05, 2015, 05:16:58 PM
Also when I move from 100 to 150Uf, should I leave the output jack resistors at 2.5k or drop down to a bit lower?
The -3dB point moves by 3 Hz going from 100uF to 150uF (not worth it), and the size difference between those caps will be huge (really not worth it), and the 2.49K resistors won't be a good value.


-PB

Paul "PB" Birkeland

Bottlehead Grunt & The Repro Man


Offline Grainger49

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 7175
Reply #250 on: March 06, 2015, 12:23:11 AM
(https://forum.bottlehead.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi244.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fgg7%2FGrainger49%2FSmiles%2FROLF.gif&hash=d8c25de5059c9863b539eef0d5a5f9c5fb975e51)

Funny, and it puts it in perspective.  Those 3 Hz might be one note, but I doubt it. 



Offline mcandmar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 1599
  • Not all engineers are civil
Reply #251 on: March 06, 2015, 06:44:38 PM
I recently picked up some 100uf and 150uf JFX poly caps on eBay, curious thing is both are 50mm diameter but the 150uf is exactly twice the length of the 100uf.  My brain is having a hard time trying to rationalize that one..

M.McCandless


Offline Grainger49

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 7175
Reply #252 on: March 07, 2015, 01:33:35 AM
I think the value of the capacitance is relative to the area.  They decided to make the plates taller rather than wider before rolling into a tube.



Offline grausch

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 126
Reply #253 on: March 18, 2015, 11:39:04 PM
Well, received shipping notice for my Speedball this morning ;D

I now have quite a few upgrades coming, but was a little hesitant to order output caps. Firstly, I suspect the difference after the Speedball install will really be minimal, and secondly, I don't really know which caps I would prefer ("different spices" as per Grainger).

Was going to order the Mundorf M-Caps, but reread the capacitor review at http://www.humblehomemadehifi.com/Cap.html and did a quick ebay Germany search for the Jantzen Cross Cap. Found the Cross Cap for a third of the price of the M-Caps. Don't think the M-Caps will sound 3 times better, so I have 2 of the Jantzens incoming.

Once those are mounted, I think the only non-upgraded parts in my Crack will be the tubes, top-plate, transformer, and PSU caps...Literally everything else either has been or is in the process of being upgraded.

Gunter Rausch

Modded Bottlehead Crack
Modded Stereomour with Two-tone Orcas


Offline Grainger49

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 7175
Reply #254 on: March 19, 2015, 12:28:49 AM
The Speedball should be one of the largest sonic improvements you will make.  It has been in everything I have put a C4S into.  Next will be improving the capacitor that the signal passes through at the output.  IMHO.

So, enjoy!
« Last Edit: March 19, 2015, 12:39:59 AM by Grainger49 »