Phono Preamp for Strain Gauge Cartridge

xcortes · 18320

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline xcortes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 997
on: January 18, 2012, 01:24:50 PM
I heard a Strain Gauge cartridge. And I liked it. Until I knew "it only works with a special preamplifier". I mean, a hardcore BH doesn't buy blackboxes, does he? (well, maybe a DAC je, je, je).

But I kept studying. And I learned that:

1. There's "vintage" strain gauge cartridges. Not only the expensive modern one with the black box attached.
2. SGs are semiconductors that behave resistively and the resistance varies with pressure.
3. Because of 2 above the cartridge needs a bias current.
4. The nature of being pressure sensitive, vs speed sensitive (as  MM or MC cartridges are) implies that their response is close to that of the RIAA curve. ie  no equalization is required (there's arguments on both sides here
« Last Edit: January 23, 2012, 06:28:27 AM by xcortes »

Xavier Cortes


Offline 2wo

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 1261
  • Test
Reply #1 on: January 18, 2012, 06:30:14 PM
Hi Xcortes,

My first cart was a Stanton 681eee. After a few of the other MM's of the day, I got a Ortofon MC 20, then a Denon 103d.

Then I heard the Roland Research, SG and was hooked. I still have mine. There was a small Op amp based board and the full discreet FET amp.
 You will need filters. After the RIAA curve is applied, at cutting to the groves on the LP. The amplitude, still is not linear.
At least I think you will need some sort of HF shelving filter, or maybe some sort or "shadow RIAA". don't know, just saying.

I will put you in touch with a friend of mine who has been working on an Roland, SS, based solution for some time...John       
   

John S.


Offline Paul Joppa

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 5833
Reply #2 on: January 19, 2012, 05:28:26 AM
Yes, a displacement signal would need shelving treble boost from 500Hz to 2122Hz - about 12.6dB boost.

Paul Joppa


Offline xcortes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 997
Reply #3 on: January 25, 2012, 12:44:23 PM
My original design will not work since the 437A at the designed parameters would have too high plate resistance.

On the needed eq. I studied the cart's response curve and, in line with Paul's comments, would need adjustments. The good thing is that those adjustments are completely in line with my system crossover points. I can just increase the volume in the mids and I'd be pretty close.

Let me count my losses, reasses and I'll be back.

Thanks

Xavier Cortes


Offline xcortes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 997
Reply #4 on: March 09, 2012, 12:58:04 PM
Quote
Yes, a displacement signal would need shelving treble boost from 500Hz to 2122Hz - about 12.6dB boost.

I know Paul is on vacation but still...

First sonic tests are very positive so I want to proceed to modify a preamp for the needed shelving.

My calculations tell me that if I replace R1 in a Seduction with a 75k resistor, R2 with a 23k one and the 33n cap with a 3,300pF one I get time constants of .323 uS and .076 uS corresponding to 492 and 2,097 hz and to a -12.6dB reduction. I would take out the 10nF and 1.2nF resistors.

In an Eros phono I would replace the 10.5k resistor with a 23k one, the .03uF cap with a 3,300pF one and remove the 0.010uF cap.

I'll give this a bump when Paul returns.
 

Xavier Cortes


Offline mellowgroovy

  • Newbie
  • *
    • Posts: 1
Reply #5 on: March 13, 2012, 11:36:51 PM
Quote
Yes, a displacement signal would need shelving treble boost from 500Hz to 2122Hz - about 12.6dB boost.

I know Paul is on vacation but still...

First sonic tests are very positive so I want to proceed to modify a preamp for the needed shelving.

My calculations tell me that if I replace R1 in a Seduction with a 75k resistor, R2 with a 23k one and the 33n cap with a 3,300pF one I get time constants of .323 uS and .076 uS corresponding to 492 and 2,097 hz and to a -12.6dB reduction. I would take out the 10nF and 1.2nF resistors.

In an Eros phono I would replace the 10.5k resistor with a 23k one, the .03uF cap with a 3,300pF one and remove the 0.010uF cap.

I'll give this a bump when Paul returns.
 

How about your preamp frequency response after insert this equalization?

Thanks,



Offline keto

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 143
Reply #6 on: March 19, 2012, 06:51:35 AM
Hey Xavier,

After crunching those numbers, its good to see you came out with something similar.

"....My calculations tell me that if I replace R1 in a Seduction with a 75k resistor, R2 with a 23k one and the 33n cap with a 3,300pF one I get time constants of .323 uS and .076 uS corresponding to 492 and 2,097 hz and to a -12.6dB reduction...."

but I would take out the 10nF and 1.2nF resistors. caps!

Here are the numbers I came up with for the Seduction circuit:

A           12dB           7dB          5dB

fz          2000          1500         1333

fp           500            666          750

R1         79577         66433       61873

R2         26525         53051       79597

C2          .003          .002         .015
 

I just have to approximate those R values and then its off to Mouser...

Tom Jones


Offline keto

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 143
Reply #7 on: March 20, 2012, 12:26:24 PM
Okay, now the real-world values, for altering the Seduction circuit for the Panasonic strain-gauge cartridges...

75K, 23K2, 33nF (12.6dB)
60K4, 48K7, 22nF (7dB)
61K9, 80K6, 15nF (5dB)

and a .068uF cap in the input, to block DC current and make the 50hz high-pass with the 47K5 grid-bias resistor.

R's are 1% 1/4W and C's are 5% 600V orange-drops.

Tom Jones


Offline xcortes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 997
Reply #8 on: March 20, 2012, 12:33:57 PM
My listening tests tell me it's more like 5dB than 12dB. We'll definitely need to get a RIAA test lp.

The sound through the Seduction is sooo good I'm tempted to mod the Eros already.

Xavier Cortes


Offline keto

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 143
Reply #9 on: March 22, 2012, 05:01:19 AM
That Eros option should be awesome.
That's a direct-coupled circuit, right?
Will the Seduction-based C and R values also work there?

Tom Jones


Offline xcortes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 997
Reply #10 on: March 22, 2012, 06:14:50 AM
Quote
That's a direct-coupled circuit, right?

yep

Quote
Will the Seduction-based C and R values also work there?

yep!!!!


Xavier Cortes


Offline Paul Joppa

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 5833
Reply #11 on: March 22, 2012, 10:40:32 AM
Quote
Yes, a displacement signal would need shelving treble boost from 500Hz to 2122Hz - about 12.6dB boost.

I know Paul is on vacation but still...

First sonic tests are very positive so I want to proceed to modify a preamp for the needed shelving.

My calculations tell me that if I replace R1 in a Seduction with a 75k resistor, R2 with a 23k one and the 33n cap with a 3,300pF one I get time constants of .323 uS and .076 uS corresponding to 492 and 2,097 hz and to a -12.6dB reduction. I would take out the 10nF and 1.2nF resistors.

In an Eros phono I would replace the 10.5k resistor with a 23k one, the .03uF cap with a 3,300pF one and remove the 0.010uF cap.

I'll give this a bump when Paul returns.
 
I'll look at this more closely later - but at first glance, I think you are implementing a 12dB treble cut, not a boost. It may be more difficult to implement with the Eros.

Paul Joppa


Offline xcortes

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 997
Reply #12 on: March 22, 2012, 10:45:42 AM
Shakes. When I read

Xavier Cortes


Offline keto

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 143
Reply #13 on: March 22, 2012, 11:00:21 AM
Oooops. We can probably do something with the parts on hand. I'll look at the numbers when I get home tonight. Thanks, Paul!

Tom Jones


Offline keto

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 143
Reply #14 on: March 23, 2012, 04:05:52 AM
How about removing the corresponding RIAA filter and doing the treble-boost after the Seduction/Eros circuit, using 50K:500 mic transformers? Would -20dB overall be too much loss? + the -12dB below 1Khz?

Tom Jones