John R. -- really just me and my preferences -- far easier to turn one knob than it is to count clicks on two stepped attenuators, and two linear pots always ends up with me going back and forth to the listening chair typically several times before I get it right, then when the mix strays to one side I feel as if I should get up and tweak it -- none of these is really conducive to deep listening IMO. I'd much rather set it and forget it.
Yes, the resistor, and even the solder play a significant role in the sonics. I've not tried all the ones out there certainly, and as well none of the real boutique ones in a stepped attenuaator, but inddividually the vishay rn-55 is a good all-around metal film resistor, the CMF-55 a step up, and then the Texas components (nude vishay's) but you can also use the super expensive tantalums, nudes, and others in more critical places -- such as shunt and padding resistors in the foreplay and probably take the whole thing up a notch. Night and day difference? Doubt it, but noticeable for sure and worth it is strictly up to the individual. My main complaint with the smd resistors is that typically the resistive element is nichrome and I just don't think nickel or chromium sounds very good in an electrical circuit.
Dan, great -- perhaps PJ will tell us more when he gets back.
John, I'll have to look again, but I recall the tubecad attenuator being a bit too large for the BH chassis, and at least for me with my new rack, widening the BH chassis is not an option. But yes, that's the idea that got me thinking about a similar approach for the FP III.
-- Jim
Jim Rebman -- recovering audiophile
Equitech balanced power; uRendu, USB processor -> Musette DAC -> 5670 tube buffer -> Finale Audio F138 FFX -> Cain and Cain Abbys near-field).
s.e.x. 2.1 under construction. Want list: Stereomour II
All ICs homemade (speaker and power next)