how will smash up affect microphonics? more gain?

rogerfederer · 13740

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rogerfederer

  • Jr. Member
  • **
    • Posts: 27
on: December 12, 2014, 05:32:37 AM
my build has been largely successful.  however, it has been noisy and microphonic at times.  i have tried attenuators at the amp inputs (helped a lot) and blue-tac between the top plate and the wood frame (prob helped as well).  i tried new 4 P1L and OD3 tubes (those 4P1Ls sure are a mixed bag; 1 new set no good; other new set not really an improvement).  the latest trick i have used is to turn it on and let it warm up before switching on the rest of the system.  this has made the most difference.  still, every once and a while (seemingly out of the blue) the tubes get all noisy and i have to jiggle them -- and they then quiet down.

will the smash up address this issue in any way?  how much will the gain be increased?  for my system it already has way too much gain...



Offline Paul Birkeland

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 19757
Reply #1 on: December 12, 2014, 09:09:59 AM
The gain increase is not significant, as the gain of the Smash preamp is quite low to start with.  The major improvement is in distortion, noise, and drive capability (voltage, not impedance).

One very helpful thing to do for microphonics is to add mass.  It may also be helpful to consider a wall shelf vs. floor rack if you are on a wood floor built on joists.  (IE - treat the preamp like a turntable)

-PB

Paul "PB" Birkeland

Bottlehead Grunt & The Repro Man


Offline rogerfederer

  • Jr. Member
  • **
    • Posts: 27
Reply #2 on: December 12, 2014, 10:02:23 AM
thanks for the response. 

where would you add mass?  i'm assuming on the wood frame?  not much room to do so on the plate. 




Offline Paul Birkeland

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 19757
Reply #3 on: December 12, 2014, 11:24:39 AM
I'd mass on top of the power transformer cover. 

Paul "PB" Birkeland

Bottlehead Grunt & The Repro Man


Offline galyons

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 626
  • Geary Lyons
Reply #4 on: December 13, 2014, 01:50:55 PM
I am not having noise issues.  The microphonics are a challenge.  I  have temporarily added mass on the top plate between the input and attenuator, as well as behind the tubes.  ( I took the balance pot out of the pre.)  I used four 1" D X 2" H stainless steel cylinders sitting on cork & rubber isolation pads, (2"x2"x 7/8").  This has pretty much eliminated acoustically related microphonics.  My stand is well damped and the shelves sit on small spikes. I don't really have room on my shelf to put much on top of the tranny.  I replaced the output caps with two Russian 2uf KBG caps.  They are much larger and heavier.  They are mounted to a small acrylic plate elevated on standoffs on the tranny screws, so that added mass below the PT. 

I will admit that adding the stepped attenuator and Grayhill switch made matters worse when they are switched.  They require more
torque to turn, are just "more mechanical" and cause more 4P1L "singing", but it quickly subsides with the damping.

I do think any method that damps the plate well to the base will be helpful.  I will likely not do much more until the Smash-up kit arrives. (Unless the microphics take a turn for the worse.)  Then I will try to isolate the tube sockets with rubber washers and silicon rings. I will also look to do some constrained layer damping on the underside of the plate.  Until then....

I am really enjoying the Smash!

Cheers,
Geary


VPI TNT IV/JMW 3D 12+Benz LP-S>  Eros + Auralic Aries + ANK Dac 4.1 >Eros TH+ Otari MX5050 IIIB2 > BeePre >Paramount 300B 7N7 > EV Sentry IV-A

Thorens TD124/Ortofon RMG-212/SPU >Seduction > Smash^Up> Paramour 45 MQ >K12's


Offline Paul Birkeland

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 19757
Reply #5 on: December 14, 2014, 06:44:21 AM
Yeah, when we do the attenuator upgrade for the Smash, I plan to just add instructions for making the switching force very light. 

In the past, I've also put a piece of thick marble tile under sensitive components.

Paul "PB" Birkeland

Bottlehead Grunt & The Repro Man


Offline Doc B.

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 9659
    • Bottlehead
Reply #6 on: December 14, 2014, 07:41:24 AM
We've done a lot of playing around with various means to reduce microphony. I think it's a three part program.

First, keep the energy from getting into the gear. Keep gear away from speakers and out of room modes and put it on a stable shelf if possible. Use some kind of squishy stuff as feet under the gear. Sorbothane works, and Herbie's Tenderfeet are very nice. I've used folded bubble wrap in a pinch.

Second, try to keep energy from moving from the chassis into the tube. A silicone o-ring under the tube can help as long as the tube pins still make good contact with the socket. Damping the chassis panel itself can be helpful.

Third, and maybe the most important, damp the tube envelope itself. IME mass is your friend. A lot of you have seen the vinyl dipped lead rings I use on my BeePre. Something similar should work well on the 4pills. Maybe some lead tape or long thin fishing weights wrapped in Teflon tape and bent into a circle fit on the tube like a crown? Stay with temperature resistant materials. One user here tried the vinyl covered rings on a Paramount, which runs the tubes at much higher temps than BeePre, and got a nasty surprise when the vinyl started to cook. I have found that Herbie's dampers work pretty well at higher frequencies, and that a really massive weight seems to be most effective for lower stuff. Filament/heater length will probaby have some bearing on where the resonances occur and thus what kind of treatment will work best. Small tube, higher frequency resonance. Big tube, lower.

Dan "Doc B." Schmalle
President For Life
Bottlehead Corp.


Offline rogerfederer

  • Jr. Member
  • **
    • Posts: 27
Reply #7 on: December 14, 2014, 10:40:56 AM
i'm not finding those vinyl covered lead rings in the right size for the 4P1Ls. 

however this item in the cabelas catalog might work:  IK-319935




Offline steve j

  • Jr. Member
  • **
    • Posts: 13
Reply #8 on: December 14, 2014, 10:45:01 AM
Other than a slight ringing when cd draw opens and closes no issues at all.
Very Pleased with the Smash.
Steve.



Offline rogerfederer

  • Jr. Member
  • **
    • Posts: 27
Reply #9 on: December 14, 2014, 01:59:31 PM
going back to my original question, i'm guessing the answer is NO, the smash upgrade will not affect the microphonics issue one way or the other.



Offline Chris65

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 341
Reply #10 on: December 14, 2014, 02:40:09 PM
Yes, it is no! ;D Microphonics is a mechanical phenomenon.



Offline galyons

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 626
  • Geary Lyons
Reply #11 on: December 14, 2014, 02:50:15 PM
going back to my original question, i'm guessing the answer is NO, the smash upgrade will not affect the microphonics issue one way or the other.

Good guess!  If I understand the upgrade, (not my first BH preamp upgrade, so better than a guess?), it adds C4S, (constant current source), and dual triode B+ regulation.  Neither of those circuit upgrades specifically address the microphonics which is really  a mechanical issue with DHT tubes.

I will use the effort in installing the upgrade to address the mechanical/mass remedies for the base, plate, tubes and sockets.  Probably even go all loctal with a 7N7 for the B+ regulation. PB and Doc are rigt on the basic solutions.  Although "starving the filaments" has been discussed for other designs, (primarily Bartola linestage/DIY audio), the Smash is really a different circuit...no OPT's.

Sounds as if you have been blessed with less than stellar performing 4P1L's.  I plan to get a couple of spare pairs.  Did you buy yours from eBay?  Suggested sellers? None of my usual Russian/Ukrainian vendors are offering any.

Cheers,
Geary


VPI TNT IV/JMW 3D 12+Benz LP-S>  Eros + Auralic Aries + ANK Dac 4.1 >Eros TH+ Otari MX5050 IIIB2 > BeePre >Paramount 300B 7N7 > EV Sentry IV-A

Thorens TD124/Ortofon RMG-212/SPU >Seduction > Smash^Up> Paramour 45 MQ >K12's


Offline mcandmar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 1599
  • Not all engineers are civil
Reply #12 on: December 14, 2014, 03:05:45 PM
I can highly recommend this seller, tested and match pairs, both sets i got were early 60's date codes.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Matched-Paar-4P1L-Rohren-direkt-geheizte-Pentoden-f-Rohrenverstarker-/201183117603?pt=R%C3%B6hren&hash=item2ed772c123

M.McCandless


Offline rogerfederer

  • Jr. Member
  • **
    • Posts: 27
Reply #13 on: December 14, 2014, 03:32:47 PM
i bought from seller marekmagda1

the 1st set were not great and he quickly sent me a new set for free. 

i'm trying a 3 lb weight from my home gym on top of the transformer.  will see how that performs.  if it helps then i'll look for one of those lead weights divers put on their belts. 



Offline rogerfederer

  • Jr. Member
  • **
    • Posts: 27
Reply #14 on: December 17, 2014, 02:08:37 PM
well, the 3 lb weight has made a huge difference :D
NO microphonics at all since adding the weight.  so i will now look for a better weight than the temporary one i have in use right now.
thanks for the great suggestions!