Technically there is not much to choose between them. The bass power handling is the same; the smaller size of the OT-2 causes a slightly higher loss, from memory around 0.7dB vs 0.4dB for the MQs.
The MQs are of course more meticulously made; you may hear a subtle difference there. I imagine one of the MQs would be easier to sell than the OT-2. The M4 can handle more deep bass power than the nickel so the M4 is IMHO best suited to a 300B amp. The nickel core has the virtue of delicacy (good bass and low distortion at very small signal levels) so I would pair it with the mesh plate tubes.
Note that the OT-2 has a 4K impedance, optimum for use in the Stereomour with the 2A3 running 300v at 50mA. The 3K impedance of the BH-5s is best matched by 275v at 55mA, again in my opinion. However, you can run the 2A3-40 at greater dissipation, say 300v at 60mA, giving close to 5 watts. You can comfortably use either the BH-5 in M4 or the OT-2 (it has M6) at that power level. The core material distortion difference is compensated by the greater number of turns in the OT-2, so I'd call that a toss-up.
There's my opinions for what they're worth.