For filament power, I would not worry much about 1.3 amps, but would be uncomfortable with more, even 1.4 amps.
The EML tubes are a tough question. They are very much "new technology" when it comes to their cathode emission - in fact that is quite likely why they sound so good. But the new cathode technology is prone to damage if the start-up transients are not managed suitably, and the suitable approaches are different from what we have become used to with the classic tubes.
Formally, we do not recommend them in our amps, in the sense that if they fail, we are not going to refund the money you spent on them. Informally, I expect the 300Bs would be perfectly fine in a Paramount. (See similar comments today under "Stereomour".)
The 2A3 Paramount is direct coupled which is a severe problem with the EML technology - do NOT attempt to use them in the current Paramount 2A3 design! We have developed a slow-start driver circuit for the Paramount which, once it is in production, will probably work with the EML 2A3. But even if it does (we have not tested it yet) it still has limitations - the amp has to rest for 30 minutes after it is turned off, before you can turn it on again. I am looking into that problem as well, but it's early days to say how it will come out.
All these difficulties are quite frustrating for me, if that was not obvious. The EMLs have such a great reputation, and the few I've heard sounded so good, that I would really like to make them work in our amps. But at this point we are still saying the amps work with the supplied tubes and with NOS tubes that are in good condition; anything else is at your own risk. I am paraphrasing Doc B here, but I can't speak for him - he may want to clarify.