How did it get to be so much?

Guest · 1541

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

4krow

  • Guest
on: September 17, 2018, 04:35:24 PM
Just browsing around some off the grid tubes, I came across the 13cw4 triode, 'NuVista' tube. Man, my head spins. Sure, I knew there were a bunch of tubes made back in the day, and yet, everywhere I turn there are these oddball little guys on each corner. Guess these are hi-mu tubes made for such applications as tuners. Question that I have is how usable are they for audio? Something says, not a bad choice.



Offline Paul Birkeland

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 19696
Reply #1 on: September 18, 2018, 04:46:33 AM
Small devices always have small dissipations, which tends to limit their usefulness. 

Paul "PB" Birkeland

Bottlehead Grunt & The Repro Man


4krow

  • Guest
Reply #2 on: September 18, 2018, 05:24:18 AM
 Thanks Paul,

  I am getting it a bit more now. Just as the 'Nutube" needed a transistor both before and after to make it work at higher levels, so does this 'NuVista' tube. So, at best this can be used as a hybred type of circuit. Also noted is the strange physical pin arrangement on the bottom of the tube.



Offline Doc B.

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 9642
    • Bottlehead
Reply #3 on: September 18, 2018, 05:30:08 AM
No need for a transistor. Look up Nuvistor based VHF RF amps for FM tuners.

Dan "Doc B." Schmalle
President For Life
Bottlehead Corp.


Offline Paul Birkeland

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 19696
Reply #4 on: September 18, 2018, 08:06:59 AM
  I am getting it a bit more now. Just as the 'Nutube" needed a transistor both before and after to make it work at higher levels,
The signal level had nothing to do with the need for buffering, it was the completely wimpy nature of the NuTube that made it completely worthless on its own.

Paul "PB" Birkeland

Bottlehead Grunt & The Repro Man


4krow

  • Guest
Reply #5 on: September 18, 2018, 09:50:07 AM
Now see Paul, I have to rethink this all over again. AND it makes me wonder why they bothered with the NuTube in the first place? I mean, if you are starting from scratch or at least have that option, the world (of tubes) is your oyster.



Offline Paul Birkeland

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 19696
Reply #6 on: September 18, 2018, 01:11:00 PM
It might be the first step in other future products that are a bit bigger/quieter/more capable.

Such a small device would be a good toe in the water to see what the interest looks like. 


Paul "PB" Birkeland

Bottlehead Grunt & The Repro Man


4krow

  • Guest
Reply #7 on: September 18, 2018, 02:41:19 PM
Yes, good point there. In fact, just a moment ago, I soldered the last wire in place for a small pre-amp/headphone amp with the NuTube. I have done it before, but wanted to add a few options in this experiment.
 So far so good.



Offline Paul Joppa

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 5822
Reply #8 on: September 18, 2018, 06:44:47 PM
Wikipedia has a short article. I have heard that they are very microphonic; the metal body rings for a very long time if it is mechanically excited. That's probably the biggest limitation for audio use.

Paul Joppa


4krow

  • Guest
Reply #9 on: September 19, 2018, 03:24:21 AM
This is all good information. I know that other tubes have the issue of microphonics as well. The 3S4, has much less than the NuTube. Now it doesn't surprise me that the 13cw4 doea also, if size has anything to do with it. The Nutube is so microphonic that even using the selector switch brings about a twitch of resonance. I have tried just about all that I am willing to do for this issue.