... going from 2W to 3.1W isn't quite a 2dB increase in level, so not exactly earth shattering.
Thanks PB. Yeah, not a ton of extra headroom, but every little bit helps. I think a 45B amp at 3.1W would make for a fair comparison with a 2A3 amp at 3.5 - I won't get the bass extension, but the 45B is supposed to have a very nice midrange, and I can listen for that and not need to factor in differences in headroom between the 2A3 and the 45B. I have in mind 3 different comparisons:
(1) 45B/3.1W vs. 2A3/3.5W - roughly equal headroom
(2) 45B/2W vs. 2A3/3.5W - for whether I like/want the added bandwidth - I may pick up some regular 45s for this as well.
(3) one 2A3/3.5W amp vs. bridged 2A3/7W two-amp combo - for benefits of 3dB of added headroom over my existing single 2A3 amp
Based on the above experiments, I can decide on which configuration/compromise suits me best: bridged pair of 45Bs @ 6.2W (more headroom) or @ 4W (greater bandwidth), or a bridged pair of 2A3s @ 7W. If greater bandwidth wins the day, I may even consider parting with my LCD4s and looking for a used pair of the LCD4z. Man, the LCD4s like a lot of juice. Example: vol. pot settings listening to Rush's Tom Sawyer at the perceived same loudish volume level: LCD4 @ -6dB vs. Focal Elex @ -24dB. And that's with the BeePree
fully open. at -9db. With the BeePre fully open, I turn the SII down to -18dB on the LCD4s, but I hear what sounds to me like a bit of distortion or auditory halo around notes (which works quite well with the bloozy rock I often listen to)I should clarify again, for others that who might read this, that I am not trying to solve a perceived performance problem. My BeePre/Stereomour II combo is absolutely killer with my LCD4s. IMHO, anyone with headphones that are hard or moderately difficult to drive should consider the SII w/ the DC Filament upgrade (but I recommend getting the other 2 as well - the Shunt Regulation upgrade is particularly amazing).
cheers,
Derek