Further to PB's post, I've discovered the following from reading some of CDE's technical papers (which are remarkably reader friendly and clear even to a non-engineer):
AC filter caps are designed to take a hell of a beating and keep performing - and if they fail, to fail reliably open-circuit: e.g., to withstand power surges, including lightning strikes! They need to be able to handle both huge voltage spikes and huge current spikes. CDE's AC filter caps (like Kemet's and others) have a pressure triggered "fail open" design that is supposed to work (at least in the case of CDE) up to 10,000A. My understanding is that high AC current through the equivalent series resistance of the cap produces heat-> expansion of cap fluid -> increased pressure in the cap -> blows the pressure-sensitive circuit interrupter.
CDE also mentions some sophisticated self healing tech in their AC filter caps. The metalized film is deposited in discrete, tiny squares that are connected to one another by minute traces. These traces act as "fuses" when a fault occurs within a square: the sudden increase in current through the faulty square vaporizes the "fuse", resulting in the electrical isolation of the failed square -- i.e., the cap "self-heals" and continues to operate normally with the failed square now removed from the circuit.
Cool stuff. But my take-away for B+ filtering where one is dealing with well less than 1A and relatively stable AC voltages: either one should work fine. Unless one plans to install the amp in, say, a tank or the control cabin of a pile driver, in which case the extra vibration damping typical of ac filter caps (although also available with some DC link caps) is the right choice.
cheers, Derek