Quickie phonostage Idea, will it work?

balancedtriode · 7791

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline balancedtriode

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 104
on: June 28, 2012, 12:46:26 PM
I was thinking of making a completely DC powered system for my klipsch's.
if i put a passive RIAA EQ Between 2 quickie gain stages, do you guys this would work?
 just one of those ideas I have in the shower or in some cases crossing a busy street  ;)
-coltrane

Thorens TD-160 Custom(rebuilt by me) with SME 3009 arm
Bottlehead Seduction
Extended Foreplay-III (build underway)
Stereomour Power Amp conversion (Heavily Modded)
Klipsch Cornwalls' with Vertical Horns


Offline grufti

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 320
Reply #1 on: June 28, 2012, 01:07:01 PM
not enough gain and too noisy



Offline jmv

  • Jr. Member
  • **
    • Posts: 22
Reply #2 on: June 28, 2012, 01:21:09 PM
Several battery-powered phonostage options are available out there, mostly in kit form.  A little searching will net you some good choices.



Offline Paul Joppa

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 5847
Reply #3 on: June 28, 2012, 02:24:06 PM
I tried to work this out a while back, when we were first working on the Quickie. The main problem is getting enough gain; I can't see it with less than three stages. (Using Quickie stages, you'd need about five of them...) The Quickie circuit could possibly be the third stage, with a volume control in front of it - it would rely on having the RIAA stage(s) physically together with the preamp, since a suitable gain stage would have a high output impedance and couldn't drive cable capacitance comfortably. A secondary problem is that the higher-gain tubes usually don't work that well at 36 volts; then want 50-100 volts.

One upshot is twice as many filament batteries, and possibly more than twice as many high-voltage batteries. At that point, you have to ask "how much battery budget is practical for a product?" One approach there would be an inverter to get high voltage from a single D-cell. We're planning to explore that, but it introduces an internal AC power that kills the purity of DC power.

If there's enough interest within these restrictions, I'll look at it again - I have always thought it would be a cool thing. Some people have DC brushless motors for their turntables ...  

Paul Joppa


Offline balancedtriode

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 104
Reply #4 on: June 29, 2012, 03:37:58 AM
I would have a great interest in a battey powered tube phono stage Kit
I think It would be amazing!

Thorens TD-160 Custom(rebuilt by me) with SME 3009 arm
Bottlehead Seduction
Extended Foreplay-III (build underway)
Stereomour Power Amp conversion (Heavily Modded)
Klipsch Cornwalls' with Vertical Horns


Offline Grainger49

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 7175
Reply #5 on: June 29, 2012, 03:52:24 AM
This doesn't sound feasible without a goodly investment in SLA batteries and a charger.  A good cheap charger is under $40.  Those that sell for under $10 will just create smoke.



Offline Noskipallwd

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 353
Reply #6 on: June 29, 2012, 06:57:51 PM
Most of the commercially available battery powered phonostages are solid state based designs, a little easier to implement than a tube based unit. I have heard the Nova Phonema, sounds great when used in battery mode. I remember seeing a kit recently that uses the tiny Raytheon tubes with flying leads, but I did not read the article in depth.

Cheers,
Shawn

Shawn Prigmore


Offline Paul Joppa

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 5847
Reply #7 on: June 29, 2012, 07:43:16 PM
Shawn, that's a good idea - I forgot, there are some hearing-aid tubes that have much smaller current drain and might work if a Quickie output stage is used. I'll look into it - I also think it would be pretty cool!

Paul Joppa


Offline Noskipallwd

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 353
Reply #8 on: June 30, 2012, 02:43:28 AM
I remember the tube now, Raytheon JAN6418. I am not sure what the military used them for, but I remember that Audio Technia still builds a microphone with this tube. Hearing aid tubes? My father has a cochlear implant, I should tell him I could have saved him money by building him something with tubes!

Cheers,
Shawn

Shawn Prigmore


Offline Grainger49

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 7175
Reply #9 on: June 30, 2012, 03:13:24 AM
Are Nuvistors in this class of tube?
« Last Edit: June 30, 2012, 04:53:31 AM by Grainger49 »



Offline Noskipallwd

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 353
Reply #10 on: June 30, 2012, 04:47:41 AM
Hey Grainger, are you referring to the "Nuvistors"? If so, i believe they are all small signal tubes. The Raytheon is a conventional glass tube with flying leads. Looks like an oversize Christmas tree light. I don't know about the hearing aid tubes, but my guess is that the Nuvistors might have worked for that application.

Cheers,
Shawn

Shawn Prigmore


Offline Grainger49

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 7175
Reply #11 on: June 30, 2012, 04:55:18 AM
Shawn,

Yes, my typo is corrected.  The ones I am familiar with are metal encased and smaller than an acorn.  And a yes to small signal tubes.  I have two, can't remember where from or why.  It has been that long ago.



Offline Noskipallwd

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 353
Reply #12 on: June 30, 2012, 05:11:57 AM
Grainger, I make typos so often that Typoist was added to my title at work. The Nuvistors are the metal and ceramic ones correct? I read something about them a while ago, it said that they had to be manufactured in a vacuum chamber by robots.

Cheers,
Shawn

Shawn Prigmore


Offline Grainger49

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 7175
Reply #13 on: June 30, 2012, 08:39:07 AM
This is the Nuvistor, out of focus, next to a standard PCB mount 9 pin miniature socket.

(https://forum.bottlehead.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi244.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fgg7%2FGrainger49%2FFor%2520Posts%2520Private%2FNuvistor.jpg%3Ft%3D1341081432&hash=a3bc551b6a860200ac012c9c26b0186596fcc6f3)

The outer shell is metal and the leads fit into a tiny, tiny socket.

If manufactured by robots they were early.  This tube was old by the 80s (early robots).  I knew of them in the 70s.
« Last Edit: June 30, 2012, 08:40:43 AM by Grainger49 »



Offline Noskipallwd

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 353
Reply #14 on: June 30, 2012, 05:38:42 PM
Cool, thanks for the picture Grainger. Went and found the article I read. You're right, developed by RCA in 1959. It said 'robotic devices', which I assume were motorized arms or something similar manipulated by a human. I guess there was no way to evacuate a metal envelope.

Cheers,
Shawn

Shawn Prigmore