$1500 coaxial cable?

Guest · 13006

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

audiophileboss

  • Guest
Reply #45 on: September 12, 2013, 01:27:22 AM
What is that chris? A type of cable?



Offline Grainger49

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 7175
Reply #46 on: September 12, 2013, 01:29:33 AM
Your post is causing me to muse.  Is digital harder to transmit than analog?

Digital is a series of steps, like a square wave.  Square waves start and end with an "infinite" frequency," the rise and fall of the square wave.  This is hard to achieve without some delay, that is, a finite rise time.

Trying to remember some of what I learned in school, transmission lines need to be terminated properly.  Any mis-match in impedance between source and cable or cable and termination (destination) causes reflections (echoes) back the opposite direction, smearing of the signal. 

So IF I have had enough coffee, the source impedance and destination impedance are as critical as the velocity of propagation, intrinsic impedance (same as the source and destination impedance) and the cable capacitance.

This leads me to believe a good digital cable should be a well engineered device for proper operation.  Maybe they should include their own termination device?

There was some fooling around with a slotted line and a TDR in the lab that week.  It had a lot to do with standing waves.  And it is time for more coffee.
« Last Edit: September 12, 2013, 07:45:52 AM by Grainger49 »



Offline Chris

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 671
Reply #47 on: September 12, 2013, 01:30:35 AM
Yep, check it out on their site.. And Mr. G, I am not sure who's post you are referring to, but you prove to me just how much I don't belong here hahaha, I tried hard to follow your post with my very limited technical understanding.. I will get coffee also and try again.. :)  All I can say is, you're the man!...
« Last Edit: September 12, 2013, 02:01:17 AM by Chris »



audiophileboss

  • Guest
Reply #48 on: September 12, 2013, 02:01:44 AM
They seem interresting enough. Can't say I will go for them. But if I come accross a pair I will pick them up and let you guys know



Offline Chris

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 671
Reply #49 on: September 12, 2013, 02:03:08 AM
Awesome... Thank you kindly...



Offline adamct

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 755
  • Maxxximum CAPacity Crack
Reply #50 on: September 12, 2013, 04:21:52 AM
Grainger,

I don't understand the technical issues, but what you are describing matches up with why Blue Jeans Cable makes a point of using Canare RCAP plugs on their coaxial cables. Here is what Canare has to say about these plugs:

"Generic



Offline HF9

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 346
  • Zynsonix.com
    • Zynsonix.com
Reply #51 on: September 12, 2013, 05:59:49 AM
That's one thing I obsess about. I like to change out any 50ohm (or less) RCA style digital connections with 75ohm BNC. It's a relatively cheap process, just pull the RCA out, drill a larger hole, deburr, install and solder in a Vampire $12 BNC chassis connector and now you're rocking at 75 ohms :)

There's also the 110ohm AES EBU balanced digital cables, I wrote about those here:
« Last Edit: September 12, 2013, 06:05:37 AM by HF9 »

My DIY Audio Electronics Blog: DIYAudioBlog.com


Offline NightFlight

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 151
Reply #52 on: September 12, 2013, 03:18:56 PM
Well, cabling trade-offs have always been between full+smooth or lean+detail. However, there is a different kind of animal. Liquid metal conductors are a complete shift in performance. Very costly and your ear would have to make up its own mind about them.  I'm just lucky to have a pair of prototypes. :P

Unfortunately the HD800 connectors proved to be too finicky for Teo to go that route.  :(

http://www.teoaudio.com/about.php
« Last Edit: September 12, 2013, 03:30:52 PM by NightFlight »



Offline Grainger49

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 7175
Reply #53 on: September 13, 2013, 02:21:19 AM
IIRC, Paul Joppa said the RCA plug/jack was invented for connections inside a radio.  It wasn't designed to carry the smallest (phono) signal within an audio system.

IMHO, The BNC connector should have been adopted by manufacturers in the 70s when high end components started to roll out.



Offline Doc B.

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 9659
    • Bottlehead
Reply #54 on: September 13, 2013, 04:20:56 AM
Well, cabling trade-offs have always been between full+smooth or lean+detail. However, there is a different kind of animal. Liquid metal conductors are a complete shift in performance. Very costly and your ear would have to make up its own mind about them.  I'm just lucky to have a pair of prototypes. :P

Unfortunately the HD800 connectors proved to be too finicky for Teo to go that route.  :(

http://www.teoaudio.com/about.php

Galinstan, presumably? Kind of like making an interconnect from solder? Or a thermometer?

Dan "Doc B." Schmalle
President For Life
Bottlehead Corp.


Offline Grainger49

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 7175
Reply #55 on: September 13, 2013, 04:43:49 AM
Interesting, liquid metal.  I know of only one and it seems to be treated as a toxic chemical these days (I rolled it around on my hands for decades, but that might be a clarification).  Maybe that is the reason for recycling? 



Offline Paul Birkeland

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 19757
Reply #56 on: September 13, 2013, 05:20:10 AM
I wonder how easily the gallium could leak out...

Paul "PB" Birkeland

Bottlehead Grunt & The Repro Man


Offline Armaegis

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Posts: 127
Reply #57 on: September 13, 2013, 06:40:35 AM
I remember reading about liquid cables before. Many years ago there was another company making some sort of liquid ceramic something speaker cable.



Offline Grainger49

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 7175
Reply #58 on: September 13, 2013, 10:04:51 AM
According to Wikipedia, which knows all, Gallium melts at 85F.  Is there a heater in the cables?  My house never reaches 85.
« Last Edit: September 14, 2013, 03:38:45 AM by Grainger49 »



Offline adamct

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 755
  • Maxxximum CAPacity Crack
Reply #59 on: September 13, 2013, 10:09:37 AM
Gallium melts at 85 deg. Fahrenheit. Galinstan is a eutectic alloy that, according to Wikipedia, has a melting point of (-2) deg. Fahrenheit in most forms (some forms apparently have a melting point of 52 deg. Fahrenheit, although it isn't clear from the article if these are actually Galinstan or some other alloy entirely).