self bias circuit removal removal risks and rewards

Davenportt · 20675

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Davenportt

  • Newbie
  • *
    • Posts: 5
Hello all,

Back in February there was a post about how the self-bias circuit works and how to remove it.  Can anyone tell me:  1.) If one uses a high enough quality NOS EF86, what kind of sonic improvement are we looking at by eliminating the self-bias circuit? and 2.)  How do I know if my NOS tube is good enough?     That is, is it safe to find out whether it biases up correctly by merely plugging in different tubes and measuring voltages?    Do I run any risks to other components if I just plug in a NOS EF86 and it's NOT up to snuff?

Thanks in advance,
David

System:  Rega P25/CJ PV-10A/CJ MV-55/EROS/S.E.X. amp/Quickie/HAMMER Super 12


Offline Doc B.

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 9657
    • Bottlehead
Reply #1 on: July 07, 2011, 09:04:25 AM
If you use a tube that won't bias properly like an EH it will not harm anything as a temporary trial, but the plate voltage will be off and the 6DJ8 will not be biased properly either. Sonically it is just a tiny, tiny bit smoother on top to my ear when you have a tube that allows use of the LED instead of the servo circuit.

Dan "Doc B." Schmalle
President For Life
Bottlehead Corp.


Offline Grainger49

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 7175
Reply #2 on: July 07, 2011, 10:57:03 AM
Dan,

How old does the NOS tube need to be?  Audio Cheapskate that I am I have a dozen of the Russian tubes from the 60s and 70s.  Very good decades for me, hopefully you too.
« Last Edit: May 01, 2012, 08:37:30 AM by Grainger49 »



Offline Doc B.

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 9657
    • Bottlehead
Reply #3 on: July 07, 2011, 11:49:22 AM
The "real" EF86s/6267/EF806S we have found to bias up nicely with the LED - Mullard, Amperex, Telefunken, Valvo, etc. The older RFTs and the Soviet winged C 6J32Ps seem to work fine also. The EF86s that don't seem to bias up properly with LEDs are the new production EHs we use in the kits. But we have seen the oddball sample here and there of other brands that didn't work, so you just have to smoke it and see.

Dan "Doc B." Schmalle
President For Life
Bottlehead Corp.


Offline Grainger49

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 7175
Reply #4 on: July 07, 2011, 12:24:46 PM
Is there a voltage measurement that tells that you have the right bias, say at the cathode?
« Last Edit: December 29, 2011, 05:12:44 AM by Grainger49 »



Offline Doc B.

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 9657
    • Bottlehead
Reply #5 on: July 07, 2011, 01:57:32 PM
Not at the EF86. The cathode voltage is fixed by the LED at 1.56VDC. The problem is the plate voltage can go too high with some tubes when biased at 1.56 V and that will screw up the bias of the direct coupled 6DJ8, so the EF86 plate voltage is what you should be measuring.

Dan "Doc B." Schmalle
President For Life
Bottlehead Corp.


Offline Grainger49

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 7175
Reply #6 on: September 02, 2011, 10:11:09 AM
Looking at the manual OB connects to the EF86 plate and should be 100V.  

I'm looking through the threads today and thought I might post the voltage.
« Last Edit: August 31, 2012, 02:09:50 AM by Grainger49 »



Offline Paul Joppa

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 5833
Reply #7 on: September 02, 2011, 04:00:12 PM
To clarify, you cannot make a useful measurement on a working stock Eros, because the servo bias will correct the plate voltage to 100v. You have to convert to the LED and then measure the plate voltage, and try another tube if it is off. I think you want between 95 and 105v at the cathode - it's pretty tight.

The really important measurement is the difference between the 6922 cathode and plate. It should be between 60v and 80v, so that this triode has adequate bias and headroom.

There is a fair amount of DC feedback from the 6922 cathode to the EF86 screen grid, which was intended to keep the parameters close enough. Works for the classic EF86, at least most of them, but it's not enough for the modern variants. I think we did try a few others along with the EH.

Basically, if you can't afford to throw away an expensive NOS EF86 now and then, you should not make this modification. Stressing about the tubes and their cost detracts from the listening experience!

Incidentally, I don't know why there is this difference. I suspect it may be differences in the metallurgy (contact potential) of the grid and cathode materials, since the dimensions of the parts are set by the machinery, and the modern reproductions pretty often use the same machines.

Incidentally, I have found big differences in 6922/6DJ8/7308/6C23Pi grid current vs. voltage, which affects the minimum bias needed on that tube. The 6DJ8s have the greatest problem, so I suggest you avoid that particular variant - the Eros is designed around the 6922, and the Repro high end preamp assumes you have found some good 7308s.

Paul Joppa


Offline Grainger49

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 7175
Reply #8 on: September 03, 2011, 02:20:21 AM
PJ,

Thanks for the very complete explanation.  I was reading over Eros threads yesterday and it dawned on me that the target voltage hadn't been mentioned.  

I should have added that the target was for a converted Eros.  I don't foresee that I would make this conversion myself.  I'm not sure the lower noise level is something I could hear anyway with the ringing in my ears.
« Last Edit: December 29, 2011, 05:16:57 AM by Grainger49 »



Offline paswen

  • Newbie
  • *
    • Posts: 5
Reply #9 on: September 03, 2011, 05:15:02 AM
A couple of weeks ago, I removed the self bias circuit by replacing the 2700uf 4v cap with a HLMP-6000 diode, replacing R3(176 ohm resistor) with a jumper wire and removing the 2n2222A transistor. The Eros sounded fabulous before the mod. Fortunately, this same great sound did not change after the mod. I also replaced the 100uf 160v electrolytic 6922 cathode bias caps with 47uf 160v obbligatto's. Before plugging the Eros in, I used E.A.R. viscodampers from Rathbun to mount the nearly full range drivers. This combination made an improvement on the soundstage-larger, more focused with slightly less grain. Paul



Offline grufti

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 320
Reply #10 on: December 28, 2011, 01:24:15 PM
I made this same change some time ago, but I wasn't sure if talking about changes to the circuits was ok on the forum. I'm glad to discover that modifications like this one can be shared here.

The change gave me a big scare about a week after I made it, or so I thought. All voltages had settled in just fine with my tubes at first, but I decided that checking was better than trusting and put my trusty Fluke DMM to work again a week later: oh no, 145V or so on the cathode, more than 200V at OA ... change tubes ... even worse ... something like 160V and 240V ... oh no, undo the mod, transistor back in, cap back in, resistor bridge cut ... what? ... the plate voltage still isn't back at about 100V ... and then the display on my voltmeter went blank, because the battery was completely dead by now.

I replaced the DMM battery and everything was just peachy, except now I had gone back to the original circuit design. So then I put the modification back in and checked everything on more time. After all that commotion I was extremely pleased to find everything working perfectly: 96.8V / 170.5V in one channel and 97.1V / 165.8V in the other. The cathode to plate difference in the 6922 is well within range at 73.7V and 68.7V respectively. Whew!

It ended up looking messier than I like it and everything took much longer than it takes to read this message, but maybe I learned something.


A couple of weeks ago, I removed the self bias circuit by replacing the 2700uf 4v cap with a HLMP-6000 diode, replacing R3(176 ohm resistor) with a jumper wire and removing the 2n2222A transistor. The Eros sounded fabulous before the mod. Fortunately, this same great sound did not change after the mod. I also replaced the 100uf 160v electrolytic 6922 cathode bias caps with 47uf 160v obbligatto's. Before plugging the Eros in, I used E.A.R. viscodampers from Rathbun to mount the nearly full range drivers. This combination made an improvement on the soundstage-larger, more focused with slightly less grain. Paul



Offline grufti

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 320
Reply #11 on: December 28, 2011, 02:26:22 PM
The 160V capacitors in my Eros are still the originals, but I will probably try that modification also.

The Eros is plenty nice no matter what. Thank you for a very well thought out design that works beautifully right out of the box ... some assembly required.



Offline Grainger49

  • Hero Member
  • *****
    • Posts: 7175
Reply #12 on: December 29, 2011, 05:21:25 AM
Every so often I get odd readings and it tells me that this year I need to change the battery in the Fluke.  I trust the readings I get from it and when it makes no sense, it is the battery.
« Last Edit: April 03, 2012, 05:33:30 AM by Grainger49 »



Offline grufti

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
    • Posts: 320
Reply #13 on: January 10, 2012, 07:25:07 PM
Switching to LED bias for the EF86 tubes in the Eros is the best change I have ever made to a Bottlehead circuit. I have listened to 3, maybe even 4, times as many LP's as I did before the change for the last three months. Right now it's Ry Cooder's Bop Till You Drop. I had forgotten about that one ... thrilling.

Getting the channel balance back to minimal differences took a bit of doing. Everything messes with everything in phono preamps: bias, channel output, RIAA curves, ... they are heaven for the OCD challenged.

Do this, if you have the tubes for it and if you have the patience to get it right. The result is shockingly good! The music will jump out at you.



Offline Prairie Dog

  • Jr. Member
  • **
    • Posts: 20
Reply #14 on: April 03, 2012, 05:13:09 AM
Hello All,
I recently switched to the LED bias, to hear what all the fuss is about.  I have several NOS types, Teles, Philips etc.
Most of the voltages are spot on with the only concern being the 6922 plate to cathode voltage being only 48 - 52 volts, depending what tubes are in.  IIRC the 170V has always been a shade low - around 150 volts - from the original build.  I read earlier in the post where PJ mentioned the plate to cathode should be around 70 volts.

I guess my question is: Is it worth being concerned over and are there any recommendations?  Would changing the value of the 47K resistor help any?

I hear what the fuss is about, by the way. 

Thanks in advance