I'm another Crack/Speedball user firmly in the Tung Sol 5998/WE 421A camp. As Laudanum pointed out, they are not the same tube. If the data sheets can be believed, the WE 421A's amplification factor is a bit higher than the Tung Sol 5998's, and so is its transconductance. They are close, however, and for many listeners both sound better than the 6AS7G/6080, no matter who manufactured the latter. These tubes' basic electrical and operating characteristics genuinely make a significant difference in the Crack's sound. I have Tung Sol and Cetron 7236s as well, and they fall pretty much in the middle: Better than the 6AS7/6080, not as good as the 5998 or 421A. And looking at the 7236's data sheet, its MU and transconductance are lower than the 5998/421A, but significantly higher than the 6AS7/6080. The 5998 and 421A definitely impress me as bringing out the most detail in a musically necessary, not analytical or dry, way. From what I've picked up in this forum and elsewhere, I believe it's probably the effect the 5998 and the 421A have on the Crack's output impedance. These tubes lower the circuit's stated 120 ohms enough to reap damping benefits, especially with the 600 ohm DT 880 phones that I use with my amp. It's a shame that a kind of modern "tulip mania" has made so many NOS tubes--the WE 421A, the Tung Sol 5998, and now even the 7236--so expensive.